Richard Hughes wrote:
The only reason Fedora ships a "sabotaged" version of argyllcms is because it has to. We can't just ship a random collection of forked libraries as a single package.
Richard, you know my view on this. If you're going to disable significant functionality due to purely bureaucratic reasons, I'd be far happier if Fedora didn't ship a copy of Argyll at all. It causes trouble for users, and trouble for me. [ libusb is a hopeless case - the official release hasn't even merged the winusb changes which have been pending for over 12 months, never-mind my libusb0.sys changes, so libusb development is basically dysfunctional at this point. I have attempted to feed my yajl changes upstream, but I've had no response.] Graeme Gill.