Is it known if the 1.6 drivers for i1 Photo Pro 2 & equivalent have the same bug? On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Serhat Abaci <serhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > There is a BUG with 1.6 ColorMunki ArgyllCMS Drivers > discussed here > http://www.nifty-stuff.com/forum/viewtopic.php?pid=66874#p66874 > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=82171.0 > http://www.luminous-landscape.com/forum/index.php?topic=82133.0 > > just revert to 1.4 and reread your patches > > > 2013/9/20 Jacek Pytowski <jpyto@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> >> >> Hi, >> >> ** ** >> I tried everything and nothing - I strongly need some help.**** >> >> I’m trying to calibrate & profile my Epson 3880 and I’ve strange problem >> with shallow blacks (shallow and cold) and with details in dark shadows >> (very dark ones: 0;0;0 – 24;24;24) After some investigation I’ve found that >> all profiles I’ve created are a little bit strange and provide to >> transformation in which input value RGB (0, 0, 0) is processed to (5, 0, >> 73)!**** >> 73 on blue channel! Nearly there is no difference printing with BPC or >> without (without even is a little bit better).**** >> I compared those results to original Epson profile for Glossy paper and >> their black color is processed to output value RGB(3, 2, 4) and on >> printouts looks much more better.**** >> >> Details:**** >> ---------------------**** >> * Printer: Epson 3880**** >> * Paper: Epson Premium Glossy Photo Paper**** >> * Measurement Device: ColorMunki Photo**** >> * Argyllcms : 1.6.0**** >> >> Command lines used to create profile:**** >> ---------------------**** >> * targen -v0 -d2 -G -g128 -e8 -B8 –f2160 -c "Epson Stylus Pro >> 3880_3885_3890 PremiumSemiglossPhotoPaper.icc" my_profile >> * chartread -v -H my_profile >> * colprof -v -qm -cmt -dpp -S "AdobeRGB1998.icc" my_profile**** >> >> ti3 file: http://www.dane.pixel-tech.pl/temp/my_profile.ti3.txt >> >> Results (data): >> >> --------------------- >> >> * Test image (AdobeRGB): >> http://www.dane.pixel-tech.pl/temp/Full_AdobeRGB_360dpi.jpg >> >> * Processed by original Epson profile (untagged RGB, raw output values to >> printer): >> http://www.dane.pixel-tech.pl/temp/ProcessedByOriginalEpsonProfile_RelativeIntent.png >> >> * Processed by my profile generated using Argyll (untagged RGB, raw >> output values to printer): >> http://www.dane.pixel-tech.pl/temp/ProcessedByArgyllProfile_RelativeIntent.png >> **** >> >> Visual result on printouts:**** >> ---------------------**** >> >> Original Epson profile: **** >> * printout is too warm, even grays are not neutral but details in shadows >> are perfect and black color is really deep.**** >> >> My profile from Argyll:**** >> * printout is very neutral (maybe even a bit cold but not sure about >> this), B&W parts are also very neutral. There is problem with details in >> shadows especially visible in this place: >> http://screencast.com/t/1WASD69fvA (on printout those areas are >> completely flat). Black color is shallow if you compare it to this one from >> Epson profile.**** >> >> I will be appreciate for any help, suggestion etc. I tried a lot of >> different parameters but main problem with black color still remains.**** >> Thanks in advance**** >> >> Jacek >> > >