YOu need your Power of attorney over the estate then bring it to the bank
with the account so you can take legal action and have the bank stop the
transactions
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:28 PM mfishman <mfishman@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello everyone, not sure if any of you can help me or not. My father was
Marc Fishman. He passed away May 22nd. He has money coming out of his
accounts for project camelot. I'm not sure how to sign in and turn it off.
Do any of you know anything about project camelot? His bank account wasn't
a personal acct it was a business act and can't be closed at this time but
in the meantime they're taking money out. Does anyone know how to stop
this??
Erica
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 7/8/21 4:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Cary Zohlman
Charly No issue discharging debt.. I know of someone who did it a few
years back when they had their appendix removed.. it got charged off. The
entire Bill. No knock on that persons credit or what/not
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The program stopped providing funds in 1997, but about 140 health care
facilities nationwide are still obligated to provide free or reduced-cost
care.
Hill-Burton facilities must post a sign in their admissions and business
offices and emergency room that notifies the public that free and
reduced-cost care is available. When you apply for Hill-Burton care, the
obligated facility must provide you with a written statement that tells you
what free or reduced-cost care services you will get or why you have been
denied.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:55 PM Skye Dymond <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill%E2%80%93Burton_Act--
The Hill-Burton Act was meant for discharging hospital debt for the
inability to pay.
It is still in force today but rarely used. Most hospital
administrators will file a claim of lien in the
county where the "resident" or responsible party resides in the NAME OF
THE PATIENT
for not paying the hospital charges.
Hospitals get federal funding and they must treat every "patient"
who walks though their doors regardless of
their ability to pay although they can discharge you if they want you
to see your doctor as they have done all they
can do for you and make the decision not to admit you into their
system. I was admitted for a traffic accident
and I never paid their bill and I had pneumonia and never paid that
bill.
I just write across the "statement" "Hill-Burton Act" for discharge
"The reality, however, did not nearly meet the written requirement of
the law. For the first 20 years of the act's existence, there was no
regulation in place to define what constituted a "reasonable volume" or to
ensure that hospitals were providing any *free care* at all.[4]
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill%E2%80%93Burton_Act#cite_note-4> T*his
did not improve until the early 1970s, when lawyers representing poor
people began suing hospitals for not abiding by the law*. Hill-Burton
was set to expire in June 1973, but it was extended for one year in the
last hour. In 1975, the Act was amended and became Title XVI of the Public
Health Service Act
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Health_Service_Act>. The most
significant changes at this point were the addition of some regulatory
mechanisms (*defining what constitutes the inability to pay) and the
move from a 20-year commitment to a requirement to provide free care in
perpetuity.* Still, it was not until 1979 that compliance levels were
defined".
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 10:38:16 AM EDT, Charley Dan <
charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Taxes is one thing. Hospital bill is another. So explain a bit more on
that. Hospital is a private business. Even if incorporated. You signed into
the hospital. Then what? Because if one can write off a hospital bill. Why
not utility bills? Or groceries? Try to explain further
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:23 AM Ray Greninger <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charley, everyone is still talking as though “they” don’t owe that tax.
WE don’t owe anyone in gov anything, the debtor does. For whatever reason
people get into trouble because they have somehow put themselves into the
position of surety for the debtor, or they think they have. It looks like
they go after the man because they figure you are the trustee and it’s your
job to settle the account. I don’t know if it matters whether or not you
are in their jurisdiction it’s your estate and you haven’t assigned a
trustee so they figure you are that guy. What I did worked, I think, is
because I told the hospital that the estate did not wish to be surety for
their securities. It’s my estate and they know it. Only I can speak for it.
Everything you sign is a security. I’m guessing here, but, that probably
forced them to go to the United States and press them to cover their
obligation. The point is the sovereign doesn’t owe anything and they know
that. They are just looking for the “tax payer” and they figure they can
con you into that role. I don’t think it’s about jurisdiction over you so
much as it’s about jurisdiction over the debtor. For some reason people
have a tough time wrapping their heads around that.
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:41 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know many who have done that including me. Just stopped paying.
Afterall I was not paying property taxes already. My great uncles saw to
that. Very few get called in on income tax by just not paying. What
happens if your one of the few? Chaulk it up to just the chosen one? What
is the back up plan?
For those who use their codes and do not pay? Never seen any success at
all from it. No matter how sensible it was interpreted by the common man.
Even the sound statement; "Show me the law" is left up to a jury of twelve
to decide. Some win, some lose. I've not lost yet.
I'll still stand on the basis I'm not in your jurisdicton and I've got
the proof. As a son of a sovereign who created the constitution and stated
I'm not involved in it. It tells me your United States limitations. Why
would I use any thing created from their forward in time of history? It is
just admitting I'm not a sovereign. I'm part of the system. I'm a United
States citizen. No thanks
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:04 AM Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And the call ins are where ?
I worry not about any section. I don’t pay any of the voluntary taxes.
Point is folks stop paying it already!
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:55 AM, brian (Redacted sender "bhaz2" for DMARC) <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, you will notice that in that 3rd paragraph, the IRS states that
their legal right to inquire about your taxes falls within Title 26 USC
Sections *6001, 6011 and 6012(a)*, (*and NO OTHER Section* -emphasis
mine!) Study ONLY those 3 sections!
So, if you get ANY letter from a lowly IRS Agent (NOT the Commissioner)
and they mention ANY OTHER IRC Code (Title 26) Section outside of Sections
6001, 6011 or 6012(a), then it is ILLEGAL for them to inquire! Know too,
that Title 26 comprises Sections 1-6999.
Title 27 USC (for the IRS) begins at Section 7000 and up, HOWEVER, Title
27 USC is *ONLY for Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms!* Sweeeeeeeet, eh!?!
Get in on Cary's Tuesday night call-ins at 7:30pm - 9pm CST, to learn
what you wont ever learn anywhere else!
peace, all!
b
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 3:18:54 PM HST, Rick Paris <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you for the info everyone!
On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am familiar w/all that. Just thought the guy that asked for the
information was not sure where to look.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick,
I think what carries referring to is the 1040 instructions. There's a
page called disclosure, privacy act, and paperwork reduction act notice,
and it used to be on page 100, but the last two years they moved it to 105
and 108. Just by scanning through the instruction manual between pages 100
and 108. The statement he usually refers to is in the first column, third
paragraph and it's the first two or three statements. And what a refers to
is the IRS has the legal right to ask for a returner statement and then
they go on to mention something about filing. What you need to do is go to
Black's law dictionary and look up the definition of file. You'll be
surprised what it is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021, 1:24 AM Rick Paris <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Does anyone know what page and paragraph of the 1040, where Cary points
out where he spoke in court about Statements and files, (filing)?
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousa
rickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousa
rickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
Life in one word--LOVE
