I used only a DBA with the ss# number written on top with no dashes. They
accepted it with no argument.
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 04:16:14 PM CDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not saying it is impossible. I Was bringing my wife out of the hospital
and they insisted a payment. Like $300 plus monthly payments. I told them ten
days I'll post in full. They insisted and I finally told them that I got ten
dollars in wallet and they accepted. So I paid ten dollars a month for about
Fourteen Months and they wrote and told me it was paid in full. That was back
in the eighties.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 2:17 PM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Charly No issue discharging debt.. I know of someone who did it a few years
back when they had their appendix removed.. it got charged off. The entire
Bill. No knock on that persons credit or what/not
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 4:06 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The program stopped providing funds in 1997, but about 140 health care
facilities nationwide are still obligated to provide free or reduced-cost care.
Hill-Burton facilities must post a sign in their admissions and business
offices and emergency room that notifies the public that free and reduced-cost
care is available. When you apply for Hill-Burton care, the obligated facility
must provide you with a written statement that tells you what free or
reduced-cost care services you will get or why you have been denied.
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 1:55 PM Skye Dymond <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill%E2%80%93Burton_Act
The Hill-Burton Act was meant for discharging hospital debt for the
inability to pay.It is still in force today but rarely used. Most hospital
administrators will file a claim of lien in thecounty where the "resident" or
responsible party resides in the NAME OF THE PATIENT for not paying the
hospital charges. Hospitals get federal funding and they must treat
every "patient" who walks though their doors regardless of their ability to
pay although they can discharge you if they want you to see your doctor as they
have done all they can do for you and make the decision not to admit you into
their system. I was admitted for a traffic accidentand I never paid their bill
and I had pneumonia and never paid that bill.
I just write across the "statement" "Hill-Burton Act" for discharge
"The reality, however, did not nearly meet the written requirement of the law.
For the first 20 years of the act's existence, there was no regulation in place
to define what constituted a "reasonable volume" or to ensure that hospitals
were providing any free care at all.[4] This did not improve until the early
1970s, when lawyers representing poor people began suing hospitals for not
abiding by the law. Hill-Burton was set to expire in June 1973, but it was
extended for one year in the last hour. In 1975, the Act was amended and became
Title XVI of the Public Health Service Act. The most significant changes at
this point were the addition of some regulatory mechanisms (defining what
constitutes the inability to pay) and the move from a 20-year commitment to a
requirement to provide free care in perpetuity. Still, it was not until 1979
that compliance levels were defined".
On Thursday, July 8, 2021, 10:38:16 AM EDT, Charley Dan
<charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Taxes is one thing. Hospital bill is another. So explain a bit more on that.
Hospital is a private business. Even if incorporated. You signed into the
hospital. Then what? Because if one can write off a hospital bill. Why not
utility bills? Or groceries? Try to explain further
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 8:23 AM Ray Greninger <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Charley, everyone is still talking as though “they” don’t owe that tax. WE
don’t owe anyone in gov anything, the debtor does. For whatever reason people
get into trouble because they have somehow put themselves into the position of
surety for the debtor, or they think they have. It looks like they go after the
man because they figure you are the trustee and it’s your job to settle the
account. I don’t know if it matters whether or not you are in their
jurisdiction it’s your estate and you haven’t assigned a trustee so they figure
you are that guy. What I did worked, I think, is because I told the hospital
that the estate did not wish to be surety for their securities. It’s my estate
and they know it. Only I can speak for it. Everything you sign is a security.
I’m guessing here, but, that probably forced them to go to the United States
and press them to cover their obligation. The point is the sovereign doesn’t
owe anything and they know that. They are just looking for the “tax payer” and
they figure they can con you into that role. I don’t think it’s about
jurisdiction over you so much as it’s about jurisdiction over the debtor. For
some reason people have a tough time wrapping their heads around that.
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:41 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I know many who have done that including me. Just stopped paying. Afterall I
was not paying property taxes already. My great uncles saw to that. Very few
get called in on income tax by just not paying. What happens if your one of
the few? Chaulk it up to just the chosen one? What is the back up plan?
For those who use their codes and do not pay? Never seen any success at all
from it. No matter how sensible it was interpreted by the common man. Even the
sound statement; "Show me the law" is left up to a jury of twelve to decide.
Some win, some lose. I've not lost yet.
I'll still stand on the basis I'm not in your jurisdicton and I've got the
proof. As a son of a sovereign who created the constitution and stated I'm not
involved in it. It tells me your United States limitations. Why would I use any
thing created from their forward in time of history? It is just admitting I'm
not a sovereign. I'm part of the system. I'm a United States citizen. No thanks
On Thu, Jul 8, 2021 at 3:04 AM Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And the call ins are where ?
I worry not about any section. I don’t pay any of the voluntary taxes. Point is
folks stop paying it already!
On Jul 8, 2021, at 3:55 AM, brian (Redacted sender "bhaz2" for DMARC)
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Also, you will notice that in that 3rd paragraph, the IRS states that their
legal right to inquire about your taxes falls within Title 26 USC Sections
6001, 6011 and 6012(a), (and NO OTHER Section -emphasis mine!) Study ONLY those
3 sections!
So, if you get ANY letter from a lowly IRS Agent (NOT the Commissioner) and
they mention ANY OTHER IRC Code (Title 26) Section outside of Sections 6001,
6011 or 6012(a), then it is ILLEGAL for them to inquire! Know too, that Title
26 comprises Sections 1-6999.
Title 27 USC (for the IRS) begins at Section 7000 and up, HOWEVER, Title 27 USC
is ONLY for Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms! Sweeeeeeeet, eh!?!
Get in on Cary's Tuesday night call-ins at 7:30pm - 9pm CST, to learn what you
wont ever learn anywhere else!
peace, all!b
On Wednesday, July 7, 2021, 3:18:54 PM HST, Rick Paris
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you for the info everyone!
On Jul 7, 2021, at 3:16 PM, Rick Miller <ricky520057@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am familiar w/all that. Just thought the guy that asked for the information
was not sure where to look.
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 2:03 PM ejartz <ejartz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rick,I think what carries referring to is the 1040 instructions. There's a page
called disclosure, privacy act, and paperwork reduction act notice, and it used
to be on page 100, but the last two years they moved it to 105 and 108. Just by
scanning through the instruction manual between pages 100 and 108. The
statement he usually refers to is in the first column, third paragraph and it's
the first two or three statements. And what a refers to is the IRS has the
legal right to ask for a returner statement and then they go on to mention
something about filing. What you need to do is go to Black's law dictionary and
look up the definition of file. You'll be surprised what it is
On Wed, Jul 7, 2021, 1:24 AM Rick Paris <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does anyone know what page and paragraph of the 1040, where Cary points out
where he spoke in court about Statements and files, (filing)?
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousarickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
With Life, Liberty, and Happiness,
Rick Sousarickparis23@xxxxxxxxx
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
--
Life in one word--LOVE
