[SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: Ivor Bowden <ivorlist@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: steve weir <weirsi@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:55:32 -0800
Hi Steve,
I really do appreciate your comments. I know I have not done my
homework, this was just dropped in my lap. I'm just looking for general
comments, I don't expect anyone to run free sims for me. Comments like,
"seems reasonable" or "no way" or "star routing might be better", etc.
is about all I hoped for. I apologize if my request came off rude.
I am open to simulation quotes, I believe it a good idea, if I can get
approval.
Sincerely,
Ivor
on 2/22/2006 4:34 PM steve weir wrote:
> Ivor, maybe. Nothing sounds terribly wrong, but that is really
> inadequate. You need to simulate, or get someone else to simulate for
> you. Then you can see if any adjustments are needed and make them. You
> need to account for what the silicon is up to as well as the trace.
>
> With all due respect your question comes off a bit like: "Guys, I
> haven't done my homework, would someone do it for me?" If someone is so
> willing, great. I would be surprised to see that. I would also suspect
> the answer.
>
> If you want detailed free help, your best chance is from your chip
> suppliers. Maybe Altera will run the simulation for you.
>
> Steve.
> At 03:22 PM 2/22/2006, Ivor Bowden wrote:
>> Hi SI Experts,
>>
>> I am reviewing a layout for an embedded DDR2 design using 4 Micron DDR2
>> chips with an Altera Cyclone controller. The memory is set up to be 64
>> bits wide, 16 bits per chip.
>>
>> The target rate is 167MHz. The design is not simulated.
>>
>> Termination is as follows:
>> ODT may be supported, still investigating.
>> There is no series term.
>> There is 0.9V stub term for control lines.
>> There is a differential 100 ohm term for each clock pair (4 total).
>>
>> Routing is as follows:
>> Control lines are daisy chained and length matched between the first
>> DRAM and controller (about 1"), each DRAM (about .75") and the last DRAM
>> and terminators (about .25"); total net length is about 3.5".
>> Data lines are length matched at about 3" (controller to DRAM).
>> Clock lines are length matched at about 4" (controller to DRAM).
>> Trace impedance is targeted at 100 ohms for clock and control lines, and
>> 75 ohms for data lines.
>>
>> Is this design likely to work? If not, what changes should be considered?
>>
>> I very much appreciate all comments. Thank you!
>>
>> Ivor Bowden
>> Engineer
>> Curtiss-Wright Controls
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe from si-list:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
>>
>> or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
>>
>> For help:
>> si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
>>
>> List FAQ wiki page is located at:
>> http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
>>
>> List technical documents are available at:
>> http://www.si-list.org
>>
>> List archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
>> or at our remote archives:
>> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
>> Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
>> http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
>>
>
>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: steve weir
- References:
- [SI-LIST] DDR2 design
- From: Ivor Bowden
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: steve weir
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- » [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: Scott McMorrow
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: steve weir
- [SI-LIST] DDR2 design
- From: Ivor Bowden
- [SI-LIST] Re: DDR2 design
- From: steve weir