[sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: "Gene A. Lucas" <geneluca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 19:04:18 -0700
I have every confidence the new crop of "recruits" will serve very
well. They might even enjoy it!
I have some suggestions for speakers....Good luck in advance to the
whole gang!
Gene Lucas
(17250)
Thad Robosson wrote:
>
> > I am sure this is not the case from some of my observations, but still
> > it does give one pause to think that maybe there is not the degree of
> > fresh blood one would expect from the current two year limit.
> > Stan.
> >
>
> Stan, et al,
>
> Not this time! While Jennifer and Dave have served prior, the 3 other
> nominees are completely new to this. I think some good fresh ideas will
> come from this board......
>
> Thad
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: david fredericksen
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: david fredericksen
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson