[sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: david fredericksen <david.fredericksen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 09:33:18 -0700
"Gene A. Lucas" wrote:
> I have every confidence the new crop of "recruits" will serve very
> well. They might even enjoy it!
> I have some suggestions for speakers....Good luck in advance to the
> whole gang!
> Gene Lucas
> (17250)
>
> Thad Robosson wrote:
> >
> > > I am sure this is not the case from some of my observations, but still
> > > it does give one pause to think that maybe there is not the degree of
> > > fresh blood one would expect from the current two year limit.
> > > Stan.
> > >
> >
> > Stan, et al,
> >
> > Not this time! While Jennifer and Dave have served prior, the 3 other
> > nominees are completely new to this. I think some good fresh ideas will
> > come from this board......
> >
> > Thad
Hey Gene,
Is that number below your name your age? If it is I'm impressed, you
don't look a day over 15,000!! HaHa, just kidding Gene.
Clear Skies,
David
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Thad Robosson
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Gene A. Lucas