[sac-board] SAC Constitution
- From: Jeff Hopkins <phxjeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2003 14:26:23 -0700
After reading the SAC Constitution there sees to be some confusion.
There are 5 board members. These are the people who are up for
election. The rest are Committee Chairman who are not up for
election. The Newsletter is the responsibility of the Secretary.
There is no Membership officer.
The board might want to consider modifying the Constitution to create
Board member positions for the Newsletter and Membership as these are
two very important positions that certainly deserve board member
status. Both the Secretary and Treasurer have definite
responsibilities beyond handling the Newsletter and membership issues.
The Newsletter and Web site should distinguish between Board Members
and Committee Chairmen.
Where/when is the Properties report? What does the club have? What
equipment, books, etc. and how do members access them?
Jeff
--
Jeff Hopkins
HPO SOFT
**************************************************************
Phoenix, Arizona Atlanta, Georgia
7812 West Clayton Drive 12170 Boxwood Circle
Phoenix, AZ 85033-2439 U.S.A. Alpharetta, GA 30005 U.S.A.
(623) 849-5889 (Fax) (770) 619-3322 (Phone/Fax)
www.hposoft.com dataman.home.mindspring.com
4th Dimension Developer
FileMaker Pro Expert
BASIC/C/C++ Programmer/Web Site Developer
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- References:
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson
Other related posts:
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- » [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- [sac-board] Re: SAC Constitution
- From: Paul Dickson
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Tejera, Rick
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Stanley A. Gorodenski
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Jeff Hopkins
- [sac-board] Re: Board Meeting tonite?
- From: Paul Dickson