[pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a little OT

  • From: "Dave V" <DValvo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 19:26:26 -0500

I had asked the community if they knew..."Before Kodak introduced
> sensitometry and densitometry does anyone know how the manufacturing
> coating process was tested and controlled????"

Then gave the answer in another post.

Dave

----- Original Message ----- From: "EJ Neilsen" <ej@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2007 1:01 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a little OT


Dave, I didn't read any other post that you may have put up on this, but I
would expect it to be visual. Like many other processes, such as cooking,
wood working, etc, while there are measuring devices to aide the worker, we
still rely an visual inspection to make it right.

Eric Neilsen Photography
4101 Commerce Street
Suite 9
Dallas, TX 75226
http://e.neilsen.home.att.net
http://ericneilsenphotography.com
Skype ejprinter
-----Original Message-----
From: pure-silver-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:pure-silver-
bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Dave V
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 2:38 PM
To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a
little OT

Sorry to mislead.  I will disclose answer later, was wondering if others
knew.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 3:28 PM
Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a
little OT


>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dave V" <DValvo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2007 9:19 AM
> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a
> little OT
>
>
> Becky, I'm sure I'm not typical of those that read this post.  I have
more
> science background than photographic (trying to fix that in > retirement).
> I have a masters degree in Image Science from RIT and spent 36 years at
EK
> from building photographic test systems to introducing new B&W papers.
I
> have taught the science side of photography to thousands of people > (most > at Kodak) but also in 5 countries. You can't imagine how trilled I am > in
> retirement to finally shoot images for myself rather than test targets
or
> Shirley's.  (Whoops!  I just let a Kodak tidbit secret out of the bag.
> The first Kodak female model's name was Shirley.  Every time someone
> needed model images, Shirley was called.  And we called the process
> ....get some "Shirley's" on this new film or paper.  When a new model
came
> along, with a different face, she was still called Shirley.  After
almost
> a hundred years of shooting tests and models there have been a lot of
> Shirley's. )  You won't believe how boring it is to look at Shirley's.
>
> The things Shannon is doing is using an instrument to measure density
and
> a pencil to plot the results.  A great learning experience and a lot
more
> precise than "looking " at an image.. Some people have listed the > books
> printed that describe the process.  That said.  Before Kodak introduced
> sensitometry and densitometry does anyone know how the manufacturing
> coating process was tested and controlled????
>
> ---------------------------------------
>   Do you know when Kodak began to use sensitometric testing?  The basis
of
> the science is due to Hurter and Driffield. The citation is to their
> paper:
>
> Ferdnand Hurter and Vero Driffield, "Photochemical Investigations and a
> New Method of Determination of the Sensitiveness of Photographic
Plates",
> The Journal of the Society of Chemical Industry, May 31, 1890
>
> Certainly Mees must have been cognizant of this but I wonder if GE > or
> anyone else at EKC was. Mees joined Kodak in 1912 but the principles of
> H&D must have been known there earlier.
> ---
> Richard Knoppow
> Los Angeles, CA, USA
> dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
==========================================================================
===================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to > your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>

==========================================================================
===================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.

=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your 
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) 
and unsubscribe from there.

Other related posts: