[pure-silver] Re: Are most photographers visual learners... a little OT
- From: "B P" <peeperphotos@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2007 15:14:31 -0800
It's interesting to me that photography takes both an "eye" and science
skills. But it's rare that anyone is really great at having both skills.
Having a darkroom partner / photography partner, who is your opposite, would
be so great.
Becky Lynn
On 11/11/07, Gianni Rondinini <freelists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> B P ha scritto:
> > I know this is a little OT but I read some of the posts on here and just
> > wish I could sit and watch! I'm a visual learner so sometimes I don't
>
> i'm a visual learner, too, and i guess this has a major role in my being
> so poor in darkroom working (printing in particular).
> i don't have anybody showing me how to do things step by step, i've just
> read here and there how 'you should do' and how 'to adapt general ways
> to your preferred ones'. i'm sorry, i don't have a preferred result,
> 'cause i have no idea of what i could get if i changed something in my
> workflow.
>
> i've read tons of incredibly interesting things on the lists (this one
> and other ones), however without practical examples i get nowhere. i'm
> not able to, and i'm not able to see what's wrong in what i'm doing.
>
> the 'net is an unlimited source of informations, but when it comes to a
> 'phisical' thing like darkroom work it's of limited use, since when
> digitalizing your prints or negatives there come too many variables that
> make impossible for people watching your digital images to understand
> what you really did.
>
> this is my *very* humble opinion.
>
> regards,
>
> =============================================================================================================
> To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
> account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you
> subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.
>
Other related posts:
