Iziataaga is a "demon" is he not? (of the same brood as Tagazin, Agarash, et al) i.e. they are denizens of Naar's domain who decided to take on "mortal" form within Aon.
Wheras "undead" are poor mortal creatures who have already died, but have been re-animated by heinous necromantic arts. (Which is why a magical weapon like the Sommerswerd is so effective against them, as it is presumeably fighting the necromancy). Or sthg.
-- David Davis
I've completed my play through (2 down, 3 to go). I found a few minor issues which I have corrected. I'll list them later so you can tell me to change them back, if necessary.
I have a question. I always assumed that the Deathlord was undead, but I can find no evidence to support this idea. It would make that final battle a little more bearable if we could double damage against him, but is that just wishful thinking? :)
BTW, has anyone done any analysis on how beatable Ixiataaga is? This book is pretty harsh. If we can find out what Lone Wolf's maximum CS and EP are, we could feed it into the LWCSC and add a footnote.
http://www.projectaon.org/staff/jonathan/lwcsc/
Of course, we would have to factor in all of the unavoidable previous battles to see what Lone Wolf's average EP would be. Oh, and I never added the feature to be able to use psychic combat disciplines. Maybe this analysis is a longer term project than I thought....
(er) tssf: These champions of evil, who were sent forth by Naar, the King of the Darkness, to destroy the fertile world of Magnamund, have themselves since been destroyed. -> These champions of evil who were sent forth by Naar, the King of the Darkness, to destroy the fertile world of Magnamund have themselves since been destroyed.
(ft) 96: Kajarda are, in fact, undead.
(er) 224: from which the Tozaz is infamous -> for which the Tozaz is infamous
(ne) random: image was missing
-- Jon