Craig Birkmaier wrote: > The ONLY use of the DTV spectrum for something new seems to be > related to the efforts of USDTV, which is using portions of the > Digital channels to deliver unique programming that would not > otherwise be available OTA. Craig - I subscribe to only limited basic cable service and thus do not pay for or get Fox News or CNN. So I am starting to like the ABC News Now channel that ABC is now testing as a free sub-channel on OTA digital TV. Currently it is mostly election coverage but there is no reason it could not evolve to be a fully advertising supported competitor to those 2 news channels. If so I will likely be a regular viewer. I think that qualifies as something new (and useful). - Tom > At 5:15 PM -0400 9/7/04, Manfredi, Albert E wrote: > >>John Shutt wrote: >> >> >>> The FCC, in it's second periodic review of the Digital >>> Television transition, has eliminated the rules requiring >>> simulcasting the programming on a station's analog channel >>> on it's digital channel. >> >>Because they have seen no evidence of OTA broadcasters using >>their two channels as independent program streams for >>increased revenues. And because they have evidence of the >>simulcast rule "impeding the distribution of HD content to >>broadcasters"? I don't get that last part. >> >>Not sure what this is about, but it doesn't seem like carte >>blanche for broadcasters to use their transitional extra >>6 MHz as just more spectrum. If they do, it looks like the >>FCC will clamp down again. My sense of this is that the FCC >>likes to abolish rules that seem to be unnecessary. >> > > > Hmmmmm... sticking my head out now that the trees have stopped blowing...over. > > 21 posts about a theoretical change in meaningless rules... > > Let's see if I understand this. > > The FCC initially speculated that it would be necessary to require > broadcasters to simulcast, in order to expedite the DTV transition. > It turned out that that it didn't matter. > > The reality is that there is STILL no meaningful audience for OTA DTV > broadcasts, whether they are SD or HD, simulcast or unique > programming. Carriage of the same programming as the analog channel > is routine in most markets. This is a no-brainer. Why would they pay > for additional program streams that nobody is watching? > > As for using the spectrum to produce additional revenues, there is a > minor problem. You need a measurable audience to sell advertising in > these programs. Other than some "beauty shot" demo reels, there is > virtually no unique programming being carried on the Digital channels. > > The ONLY use of the DTV spectrum for something new seems to be > related to the efforts of USDTV, which is using portions of the > Digital channels to deliver unique programming that would not > otherwise be available OTA. > > As usual, the bottom line remains the same...this transition is > REALLY all about protecting the NTSC franchise. Everything else pales > in significance. > > Regards > Craig > > P.S. If the broadcasters and the FCC were really serious about the > transition they would require full power carriage of the main > programming of the station on the digital channel and letterbox > carriage of widescreen programming on the analog channel. That is, > they would make the DTV product more desirable than the old analog > product. > > > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: > > - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at > FreeLists.org > > - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word > unsubscribe in the subject line. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.