John Golitsis wrote: > The only advantage I can see a broadcaster taking is to > show MORE desirable content on their digital channel. > Take the Olympics, for example. If NBC was tied to a > simulcast rule, they would not have been able to offer > the different HD coverage of the games that they did. It would have made no difference. The simulcast rule only said that the "main" program stream shown in the analog channel had to be simulcast in a digital channel. It didn't say that main stream had to be HDTV. In theory, other subchannels of the digital channel could have been HD rather than the main channel, or none needed be HDTV. During the Olympics, it would seem to me that NBC could transmit their main Bob Costas channel over analog and over one digital subchannel, and then other streams as they saw fit over other digital subchannels. This seems to be the intent of the FCC, then *and* now. Without the simulcast requirement in place, instead, NBC could have transmitted the main Bob Costas channel only over analog (for example), and then used the digital 6 MHz only for the more specialized streams. That would have justifiably p*ssed off the NCTA. The analog 6 MHz is meant to be only for purposes of a smooth transition. So again, I'm baffled why the FCC wants to give their critics more fodder for wailing. Bert ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You can UNSUBSCRIBE from the OpenDTV list in two ways: - Using the UNSUBSCRIBE command in your user configuration settings at FreeLists.org - By sending a message to: opendtv-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.