[minima] Re: A New Approach

  • From: "Joe Rocci" <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 11:59:42 -0500

Neil

Well, so far the whole thing has been 'ugly' construction in some form or 
other. The good thing is that I've built and rebuilt the important circuits 
several times, several ways, so I'm confident it's reproducible.

Stay tuned...
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Neil Martinsen-Burrell 
  To: minima@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
  Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 11:47 AM
  Subject: [minima] Re: A New Approach


  Joe,


  As a minima lurker and beginning homebrewer, I greatly appreciate your 
comments and contributions here. I think we are all better off if there is 
another modern BiDi SSB transceiver design in the world.  There are many 
different ways to skin this same cat as you and Allison have taught so many of 
us.


  I, for one, would love to see a schematic, even a somewhat incomplete one. I 
am more likely to try building something that is Manhattan- or ugly-style with 
leaded parts, but again there's the thing about cats and their skins. 
Presumably your design would work with that technique as well, perhaps with 
some necessary part substitutions.


  Thanks again for everything you have contributed here for the learning of all 
of us.


  -Neil N0FN


  On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Joe Rocci <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

    For the last several months, I've been quietly and slowly developing the 
components for a different approach to the Minima. I've written about some of 
the concepts here, but I never really laid out the whole thing. At the risk of 
creating a major fork in this group, I'm going to describe where I'm going. If 
there's serious interest, I'll put all this up on my own web site, along with a 
discussion forum for anyone who wants to follow along.

    Here are the key components:
    1) A high-level front-end mixer based on my Quad FST3257 bus switch design. 
It accepts Si570 or Si5351 drive levels.
    2) An IF at 9 mhz, but changeable according to the builder's tastes. I'm 
considering an optional dual xtal filter for SSB/CW, using bus switches for 
filter switching.
    3) A totally different BiDi amp architecture. This one uses a single Hybrid 
Cascode amplifier with a complimentary NPN-PNP output stage. It easily develops 
30 dB of gain, up to +10dbm of uncompressed output power, excellent input and 
output match, and about 3.5db noise figure according to LTSpice. It only draws 
about 18 ma. It has well over 70 db of voltage-controlled gain range that can 
be used for TX ALC as well as Rx AGC. This single amp is turned around from the 
Rx direction to the Tx direction with another FST3257 bus switch. It works very 
nicely.
    4) A product detector made with another FST3257. It also accepts 
Si570/Si5351 drive levels.
    5) Audio amplifier chain that is made with a single package of low-noise 
op-amps. This amplifier chain is used for Tx as well as Rx and is turned around 
with some left-over switches in the product-detector bus switch package.
    6) Detectors for audio-derived Rx AGC and RF-derived Tx ALC. Both of these 
are optional.
    7) Should be possible to use the Minima control system as a control 
foundation with relatively simple changes

    I've done some preliminary bench testing of the whole RX chain (minus input 
filters) and the 10db sensitivity is in the sub-1uv range. In Tx mode, it's 
putting out about 3-5 dbm. There are two easy to make binocular core 
transformers in the mixer (possibly one can be eliminated) and another in the 
product detector. Other than the FST3257 bus switches, everything else is done 
with a few 2N3904's & 2N3906's, a J310 and a pack of quad op-amps. Overall, I 
don't think the parts count is much/any higher than the Minima.

    This basic Xcvr sub-system can be finished off in several ways:
    1) The input filters, which will be a separate board, can be individual 
switched bandpass filters (my preference) or a pair of low-pass filters as in 
the Minima. Based measurements I'm seeing, I'm pretty sure the LPF approach is 
workable with the 9mhz IF, although the IF can be built for other frequencies. 
In either case, I plan to use more FST3257 switches to select input filters.
    2) AGC/ALC can be left out at the builder's desire.

    I'm calling this design the "BSS-1", standing for "Bus Switch Special". I 
started to draw the schematic in Eagle with the intention of making a PCB. Due 
to my own design tastes, I'm doing the first layout with SMD components. This 
generally results in smaller size and better performance. 

    Although I fully intend to take this to fruition on my own, I sometimes get 
sidelined for long periods of time, so a group effort would keep things moving. 
If there's enough interest, I'll put up the forum I mentioned.

    Joe
    W3JDR

Other related posts: