On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 11:09 AM, William Adams <william_a_adams@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Rant, or 'future features' :-) It's just a matter of perspective I think. > > I'm not personally constrained by any implied Lua oversight committee. I'm > just a developer trying to crack a nut. > > LuaJIT came along with FFI, and I've been happily making my code > non-compliant ever since. LuaJIT is in FACT a new language variant. luaffi is EXTREMELY close to being API-compatible with LuaJIT FFI (IIRC the only difference is in null/nil handling), so even that's not fatal. /s/ Adam