On 2004/10/30, at 1:20, Ursula Stange wrote: > This, of course, didn't threaten anyone's life, and I'd like to think=20= > if my laziness could have had more dire consequences, I would have=20 > kept checking the books. But I suspect that laziness creeps in=20 > everywhere. It's always seemed the grossest unfairness of our unfair=20= > lives that we can all make the same mistakes and only some of us pay=20= > for them. It isn't just laziness. What is a company to do when its market is=20 mature and the bosses and shareholders are still demanding growth?=20 Trimming costs may start out yielding greater efficiency; but sooner or=20= later it inevitably becomes cutting corners. In markets that deal in non-essential goods the result may simply be=20 shoddiness that eventually puts the firm out of business. In markets for essential goods (food, medicine, power, transportation)=20= the predictable result is a disaster. Thus, in Japan, for example, the=20= last few years have produced a regular spate of food contamination=20 incidents, railway crashes, and just short of catastrophic breakdowns=20 at nuclear power plants=81\all cases that satisfy the conditions = mentioned=20 above. In the best case, the disaster is both dramatic enough to stimulate=20 reform and small enough not to be destructive on a large scale. John McCreery P.S. Feeling gloomy on another rainy day in Yokohama.= ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html