I was probably being too touchy - it occurred to me later that there could be another reading to your message, but that was when my replies were already in the pipeline. O.K. --- JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote: > I was being frivolous and facetious. I should > perhaps not read my e-mail > after a very long day, at 3:00 a.m. Apologies for > the offensive factor. I did > not mean harm, but I was too careless about how > flippancy is conveyed > on-line. > > Julie Krueger > > > ========Original Message======== Subj: > [lit-ideas] Re: Is torture wrong > by definition? Date: 4/9/06 9:59:20 A.M. Central > Daylight Time From: > _omarkusto@xxxxxxxxxx (mailto:omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx) > To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: > Besides the fact that I don't understand what you > are > trying to say, I find your message pretty offensive. > I > don't subscribe to a list in "literature in ideas" > to > get this kind of comments. And, I can get a match > without your assistance, thank you. > > O.K. > > > --- JimKandJulieB@xxxxxxx wrote: > > > I'm thinking Omar and Delia ought to get > together. > > A match made in heaven. > > > > Julie Krueger > > > > > > ========Original Message======== Subj: > > [lit-ideas] Re: Is torture wrong > > by definition? Date: 4/7/06 1:56:05 A.M. Central > > Daylight Time From: > > _omarkusto@xxxxxxxxxx > (mailto:omarkusto@xxxxxxxxx) > > To: _lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > (mailto:lit-ideas@xxxxxxxxxxxxx) Sent on: > > > > > > --- Eric Yost <eyost1132@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > *I must have missed the news. > > > > > > Wait until the Moussaoui verdict. Part of it > > > relied on KSM's confession. > > > > *I see. The spurious verdict against Mossaoui > will > > be > > validated by Mohammad's spurious "confession." > Which > > which will then, in its turn, validate the > > confession. > > Which will then, again, validate the verdict. > And > > so > > ad nauseam. > > > > O.K. > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > > protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > To change your Lit-Ideas settings > (subscribe/unsub, > > vacation on/off, > > digest on/off), visit > > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, > vacation on/off, > digest on/off), visit > www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html