> >> Does this mean that my assessments will be 'more honest, >> meticulous, or caring'? Not unless something more is factored in. > >I agree. That is why I usually add several comments on what I am >looking for. Basically there are five criteria: > >1) Accuracy--Get the facts and definitions right >2) Sound judgment--Distinguish major from minor points >3) Effective use of detail--Demonstrate real understanding >4) Unexpected insight--Surprise and delight me >5) Serious risk-taking--Come up with something new and compelling You're almost home and dried at this point. The way to make evaluation fair is to create a rubric that is based on criteria like these and incorporates a scoring strategy for each one: you could, for example, give a 5/5 for all facts and definitions correct, 4/5 for most correct (only one or two incorrect) , 3/5 for many correct etc and do the same for each criterion. The important thing is to discuss the criteria for assessment with the students *in advance* so everyone is clear what *exactly* is being evaluated. You need operationalize terms like "sound", "effective" "unexpected" and "serious" which don't seem ambiguous but actually are. (There's always reason for argument: I actually spent almost two hours arguing with a student's mother because she claimed a stick figure drawn by her son did indeed constitute one of three "significant focal elements" in a Photoshop compositing assignment I gave.) None of this changes the fact that, at bottom, evaluation is about judgement which has a huge subjective component. A rubric makes that judgement a little fairer. There's no substitute however for giving the students the benefit of the doubt and maybe this is a recent practice which is the basis for grades seeming inflated. David Savory ------------------------------------------------------------------ To change your Lit-Ideas settings (subscribe/unsub, vacation on/off, digest on/off), visit www.andreas.com/faq-lit-ideas.html