On Apr 21, 2010, at 4:06 PM, Ivan Vodopiviz <merkoth@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Fredrik Holmqvist <fredrik.holmqvist@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:2010/4/20 Jorge G. Mare <koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>:IMHO, having a strong brand is more important to the project. What do you think?+1 to that. But I'd also like to see some variations though. Google isquite good example with their ever changing logo image. /Fredrik Holmqvist, TQHIMHO, branding changes should be reserved for big changes in the product that brand represents, not a minor iteration in the development process. I know that alpha 2 will bring major enhancements over alpha 1 and I have no doubt that a lot of code got revised, fixed or even rewritten. But closer or farther, we're still talking about R1 and not a groundbreaking update to an already established "product". But maybe I'm taking this way too seriously. -- Iván Vodopiviz
I'm tending to agree with Iván on this. R1 is not yet released yet so I do not think that we should have branding changes until the release of R2 because that will bring major changes to the codebase.
Matthew Veety