Howdy, Matt Madia wrote: > On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 16:30, Jorge G. Mare<koki@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> >From my perspective, the image is now in quite good shape. It was >>> definitely a good move to set a date and have everyone in bug-fixing mode. >>> But at the same time, freezing tomorrow seems to me like we are perhaps >>> rushing things a slight bit too much. What's the general feeling? >>> >>> >> I am all for giving Marcus the time he would need to get the ATA stack >> in better shape. After all, I don't think a few more days (or even a >> couple or more of weeks for that matter) are a big deal in the context >> of the 8+ years that took us to get here. >> >> IOW, if a bit more time is needed to make alpha 1 a better release, then >> we should not be shy or ashamed to change the freeze/release date(s) IMO. >> >> > > *if* the release were to be delayed, would anyone be willing to write > a quick news blurb to reinforce the reasons? > (assuming such an article would even be desirable) > mainly to re-assure the public of 'yes we planned to release on > <date>, but for the benefit of users and developers, it has been > rescheduled for <new date>. These are the issues being addressed > during this time : <issues>.' > I would not post any news nor go into any details. Instead, I would just post on the front page a prominent notice box like the one you can see here... http://www.haiku-os.org/blog/koki/2009-07-16/testing_css_styles ...stating something along the lines of: ********* Work is underway to get Haiku R1 Alpha 1 out the door, and the release is currently scheduled for September 14. However, this date is still tentative and subject to change. A firm release date will be announced at a later date. Stay tuned! ********* I can add this to the website if you guys want. Cheers, Jorge/aka Koki