[bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: "siss52" <siss52@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 13:05:22 -0500
If the books are not rejected or dealt with by validating them, they remain
on Step 1 ad infinitim!!!
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Petraccaro
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 11:11 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
I take it that the books are not rejected? Isn't there another problem that
this causes, namely that books that others might do are in noman's land as
long as they're on the step 1 page?
Again, I appologize if I'm being uninformed or dense.
----- Original Message -----
From: siss52
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 7:33 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
Hi Gary,
There is at least one submitter who keeps submitting poor scans
regardless. People have even talked with this submitter, and on one
occasion the submitter claimed not to have enough time to clean up the
scans. Lisa Friendly posted that submitters will not get credit until the
submissions are in the collection, and that this should stop people from
submitting poor scans. So I guess the answer to your questioon is that
there are those who will not take a hint. <smile>
Sue S.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Petraccaro
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 5:23 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
The thread has to do with poor submitters, right? If rejecting a book
gets rid of the book, won't they get the hint when their books no longer
show on the step 1 page?
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 12:53 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
I don't understand how rejecting a book has anything to do with this
thread.
----- Original Message -----
From: Gary Petraccaro
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 9:55 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
Forgive my ignorance, but doesn't rejecting a book remove it from the
step one page? If not, how does that happen?
Thanks.
----- Original Message -----
From: Jill O'Connell
To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, September 21, 2007 11:48 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
But that doesn't help us who are looking for a book to validate and
trying
to avoid the poor submitters. I think E's idea is wonderful and
hopefully
the benefit would be that when poor submitters' books stayed on the
step 1
list for a long time, said submitter would get the idea that unless
he
submits better scans, his books aren't going to be validated.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pratik Patel" <pratikp1@xxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 10:25 PM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
> While volunteers do not know the identity of the siad
Bookshare.org
> Volunteer, the staff have the capability of finding out. through
the
> software.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jill
O'Connell
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 11:29 PM
> To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent
ratings
>
> I really like that idea!
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "E." <thoth93@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 6:35 PM
> Subject: [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
>
>
>> You may notice I notice that books with less than excellent
ratings are
>> listed sometimes as coming from "a bookshare volunteer".
>>
>> I respect the volunteer's need to remain anonymous though I
frankly fail
>> to quite understand the need. But i am sure I do need things
others do
>> not understand. What about giving each "bookshare volunteer" a
number.
>> So there might be "bv1" "bv75" and so on. Then feedback can be
addressed
>> to say, bv65. Or I might realize that I like the books bv115
scans. I
>> Might decide the books bv110 scans have the same kind of scanos
time
>> after
>
>> time. I can then decide if I want to validate the scans of a
particular
>> bookshare volunteer. We validators have favorite submitters. We
often
>> work in pairs (a submitter and a validator) to make a book come
out
>> beautifully.
>>
>> E.
>>
>> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
>> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get
a list
>> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG. Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database:
269.13.27/1020 -
>> Release Date: 9/20/2007 12:07 PM
>>
>>
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get
a list
> of
> available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
>
> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get
a list
> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the
subject line.
>
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG.
> Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:
> 9/20/2007 12:07 PM
>
>
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a
list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject
line.
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:
9/20/2007 12:07 PM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1021 - Release Date:
9/21/2007 2:02 PM
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.27/1020 - Release Date:
9/20/2007 12:07 PM
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.488 / Virus Database: 269.13.28/1021 - Release Date:
9/21/2007 2:02 PM
- References:
- [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Lori Castner
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Pratik Patel
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: siss52
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- [bksvol-discuss] yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Lori Castner
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: yes, let's get tough.
- From: Jim
- [bksvol-discuss] books with less than excellent ratings
- From: E.
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Pratik Patel
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Jill O'Connell
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: siss52
- [bksvol-discuss] Re: books with less than excellent ratings
- From: Gary Petraccaro