Hi, I will add to this that as a blind validator, it would probably be difficult to correct all font problems. If I am incorrect about this, I am certainily open to validation help. Jim James D Homme, , Usability Engineering, Highmark Inc., james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 412-544-1810 "it is only possible to live happily ever after on a day-to-day basis." -- Margaret Bonnano "Anastasia Saridakis" <anamatia81@yahoo To .com> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent by: cc bksvol-discuss-bo unce@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject g [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers 02/01/2008 07:48 PM Please respond to bksvol-discuss@fr eelists.org Hi Judy Before telling you my thoughts about your question let me introduce myself I'm Anastasia; I am legally blind and use a screen enlarger. So I can see the print but it is straining so I prefer to listen. Here are my thoughts: I scan in one file type that keeps the format, kes, and submit it in one that deletes the format. This type, rtf is more universal. RTF automatically deletes the formats. It is more fluid listening to it without the format. However, I can understand as someone who reads print why keeping the format in tact for the recent members would be beneficial, the only format that keeps the print in tact is KES and that is not a universal file. I hope I have answered your question If you have further questions or would like to further discuss this topic please email me off list. Anastasia Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.