I'll be curious to know what you come up with. Imagine proofing a 220 page document that way. I would have killed that JAWS cursor voice if I could have! *grin* Donna > -----Original Message----- > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss- > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lora > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:24 PM > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > Hi, Donna, > > OH, I wouldn't disagree with you. After I tried it with Outlook, I > quickly > turned off the setting, because otherwise JAWS and I were going to have > a > problem. > > There are ways to improve this, though. I'd just have to do some > research. > For instance, I believe we could make JAWS beep every time the font or > color > changed, which might be a better audible indicator. That way, it > wouldn't > disrupt the flow of what you were reading, but you'd still know that > something changed. > > Just thinking aloud. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Donna Goodin > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 5:18 PM > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > other > types of disabled bookshare readers > > Hi guys, > > I have to chime in here. I used those settings while I was editing my > dissertation, and I have to tell you that it is *REEEEEEEEEEEEALLY > annoying > to read that way. Especially if there are a lot of font, color or > other > attribute changes, it can get so distracting that you can hardly pay > attention to the text. Not saying it's not an option, just that it's > definitely got serious limitations. > Donna > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bksvol-discuss- > > bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Lora > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 7:06 PM > > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > Yes, I believe it works with versions of JAWS from 6.0 and beyond. > > > > And you'd make sure you were in Word, then press Insert-F2. You > > should get a list of options. Either arrow down through the list, or > > hit C until JAWS says Configuration Manager. Either way, press enter > > once you get there. > > > > The Settings menu can be accessed from within the Configuration > > Manager by Pressing Alt-S. > > > > Once that menu comes up, arrow down to Speech and Sounds manager and > > press enter. > > > > From there, choose the sound scheme you want. When you're on a sound > > scheme, you can press Tab to hear a description of that sound scheme. > > (I > > know that works in JAWS 8 and 9, and assume it would work in 7.1 as > > well.) > > > > I hope this helps. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Allison > > Hilliker > > Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2008 3:43 PM > > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > Hi Lora, > > > > This is a very interesting JAWS option. Do you know if it works with > > v 7.1? > > > > Also, how does one get into the configurations menu? > > > > Best, > > Allison > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Lora" <loravara@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:48 PM > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > > > > Actually, JAWS can be set to announce font and color changes. > > > Before I open my mouth and insert my foot, I'm trying a little > > > experiment here. Sighted readers should see three different > colors, > > > and three different fonts, in this message. > > > > > > In order to do this, go into the Configuration Manager for Word or > > > Outlook, and choose the Speech and Sounds Manager from the Settings > > > menu. In there, you'll see lots of different sound schemes for > > > working with things like VB.Net, or the Web. I chose Proofreading > > > Attributes, Font Info and Color. > > > > > > Now as I read, JAWS announces the color changes as they occur, and > > > reads different fonts in different voices. > > > > > > Sorry to sighted readers if this message looks chaotic . You can > > > make these same configuration changes in Word or Word Perfect, etc. > > > > > > The trouble is, in order for this to be effective, you'd have to be > > > reading the whole book. If you were, though, font and color > changes > > > would be announced. > > > > > > What I was hoping was that JAWS had a Quick Keys setting for font > > > change, but I don't see one. Then you could just move to the next > > > font change, and that'd be easy. > > > > > > You can also use Word's find features to find a specific font, or > > find > > > a specific color of text, but for that to be useful, you'd have to > > > know what you were looking for. > > > > > > None of this probably helps much, but I thought I'd throw in my two > > cents. > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > From: bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > [mailto:bksvol-discuss-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Carrie > > > Karnos > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 4:00 PM > > > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > > > > > > Hi Evan, > > > > > > One option is for blind validators to set the font of the entire > > > book to > > > 11 > > > (or thereabouts). I don't particularly like this option because > it's > > > harder for sighted people to see chapter and section titles when > > > they are the same size as the regular text, but it is an option. > > > > > > Just an FYI, Carrie > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ---- > > > From: EVAN REESE <mentat3@xxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > Sent: Monday, February 4, 2008 1:47:46 PM > > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > > > I think you're right on this. Being unable to see the screen, I > have > > > no idea > > > > > > how I can be aware of - let alone correct - font problems without > > > checking the font of every word in the book manually. I have > checked > > > the fonts of headings when scanning or validating books, but for > the > > > rest, I just have to > > > > > > assume the fonts are okay. A person with enough vision to see the > > > screen can > > > > > > look at a whole page and see that something is out of whack. I > don't > > > see how > > > > > > somewhat with insufficient vision could do anything similar. If I > am > > > mistaken, please let me know. I could, of course, check each page > in > > > Word or > > > > > > K1000 and see what kinds of fonts are on it, and what the sizes > are. > > > But as far as I know, those programs don't tell you which font is > > > where on the page. So someone who cannot see the screen would need > > > some way of hearing - on the fly - when the font changes and the > new > > > characteristics. Is that possible? Unless that can be done, or > there > > > is another way for someone with little or no vision to be aware of > > > font problems without a great deal of time consuming manual > > > checking, it seems unrealistic to expect that books on > > > > > > Bookshare will have no font problems, as long as people with little > > or > > > no vision are submitting or validating them. > > > > > > Evan > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:55 AM > > > Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs > > > other types of disabled bookshare readers > > > > > > > > >> Hi, > > >> I will add to this that as a blind validator, it would probably be > > >> difficult to correct all font problems. If I am incorrect about > > this, > > >> I am certainily open to validation help. > > >> > > >> Jim > > >> > > >> James D Homme, , Usability Engineering, Highmark Inc., > > >> james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 412-544-1810 > > >> > > >> "it is only possible to live happily ever after on a day-to-day > > >> basis." -- Margaret Bonnano > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> "Anastasia > > >> Saridakis" > > >> <anamatia81@yahoo > > To > > >> .com> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> Sent by: > > cc > > >> bksvol-discuss-bo > > >> unce@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject > > >> g [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question > on > > >> Scan quality for blind vs > other > > >> types of disabled bookshare > > readers > > >> 02/01/2008 07:48 > > >> PM > > >> > > >> > > >> Please respond to > > >> bksvol-discuss@fr > > >> eelists.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi Judy > > >> > > >> Before telling you my thoughts about your question let me > introduce > > >> myself I'm Anastasia; I am legally blind and use a screen > enlarger. > > >> So I > > can see > > >> the print but it is straining so I prefer to listen. > > >> > > >> Here are my thoughts: I scan in one file type that keeps the > > >> format, > > kes, > > >> and submit it in one that deletes the format. This type, rtf is > > >> more universal. RTF automatically deletes the formats. It is more > > >> fluid listening to it without the format. However, I can > understand > > >> as > > someone > > >> who reads print why keeping the format in tact for the recent > > members > > >> would be beneficial, the only format that keeps the print in tact > > >> is > > KES > > >> and that is not a universal file. I hope I have answered your > > question > > >> If > > >> you have further questions or would like to further discuss this > > topic > > >> please email me off list. > > >> > > >> Anastasia > > >> > > >> > > >> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! > > >> Search. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > >> bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > >> put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get > a > > list > > >> of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the > subject > > line. > > >> > > >> > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > > list > > > of > > > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject > > line. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _____ > > > > > > Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. > > Try > > > > > > <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51733/*http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06 > > i > > 62sR8 > > > HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ> it now. > > > > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > > list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the > > subject line. > > > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > > list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the > > subject line. > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > list of > available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line. > > To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to > bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a > list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the > subject line. To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.