[bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- From: "EVAN REESE" <mentat3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 16:47:46 -0500
I think you're right on this. Being unable to see the screen, I have no idea
how I can be aware of - let alone correct - font problems without checking
the font of every word in the book manually. I have checked the fonts of
headings when scanning or validating books, but for the rest, I just have to
assume the fonts are okay. A person with enough vision to see the screen can
look at a whole page and see that something is out of whack. I don't see how
somewhat with insufficient vision could do anything similar. If I am
mistaken, please let me know. I could, of course, check each page in Word or
K1000 and see what kinds of fonts are on it, and what the sizes are. But as
far as I know, those programs don't tell you which font is where on the
page. So someone who cannot see the screen would need some way of hearing -
on the fly - when the font changes and the new characteristics. Is that
possible? Unless that can be done, or there is another way for someone with
little or no vision to be aware of font problems without a great deal of
time consuming manual checking, it seems unrealistic to expect that books on
Bookshare will have no font problems, as long as people with little or no
vision are submitting or validating them.
Evan
----- Original Message -----
From: <james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2008 8:55 AM
Subject: [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other
types of disabled bookshare readers
Hi,
I will add to this that as a blind validator, it would probably be
difficult to correct all font problems. If I am incorrect about this, I am
certainily open to validation help.
Jim
James D Homme, , Usability Engineering, Highmark Inc.,
james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 412-544-1810
"it is only possible to live happily ever after on a day-to-day basis." --
Margaret Bonnano
"Anastasia
Saridakis"
<anamatia81@yahoo To
.com> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cc
bksvol-discuss-bo
unce@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject
g [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on
Scan quality for blind vs other
types of disabled bookshare readers
02/01/2008 07:48
PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss@fr
eelists.org
Hi Judy
Before telling you my thoughts about your question let me introduce myself
I'm Anastasia; I am legally blind and use a screen enlarger. So I can see
the print but it is straining so I prefer to listen.
Here are my thoughts: I scan in one file type that keeps the format, kes,
and submit it in one that deletes the format. This type, rtf is more
universal. RTF automatically deletes the formats. It is more fluid
listening to it without the format. However, I can understand as someone
who reads print why keeping the format in tact for the recent members
would be beneficial, the only format that keeps the print in tact is KES
and that is not a universal file. I hope I have answered your question If
you have further questions or would like to further discuss this topic
please email me off list.
Anastasia
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list of
available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
Other related posts:
- » [bksvol-discuss] Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
- » [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on Scan quality for blind vs other types of disabled bookshare readers
Hi,
I will add to this that as a blind validator, it would probably be
difficult to correct all font problems. If I am incorrect about this, I am
certainily open to validation help.
Jim
James D Homme, , Usability Engineering, Highmark Inc.,
james.homme@xxxxxxxxxxxx, 412-544-1810
"it is only possible to live happily ever after on a day-to-day basis." --
Margaret Bonnano
"Anastasia
Saridakis"
<anamatia81@yahoo To
.com> bksvol-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent by: cc
bksvol-discuss-bo
unce@xxxxxxxxxxxx Subject
g [bksvol-discuss] Re: Question on
Scan quality for blind vs other
types of disabled bookshare readers
02/01/2008 07:48
PM
Please respond to
bksvol-discuss@fr
eelists.org
Hi Judy
Before telling you my thoughts about your question let me introduce myself
I'm Anastasia; I am legally blind and use a screen enlarger. So I can see
the print but it is straining so I prefer to listen.
Here are my thoughts: I scan in one file type that keeps the format, kes,
and submit it in one that deletes the format. This type, rtf is more
universal. RTF automatically deletes the formats. It is more fluid
listening to it without the format. However, I can understand as someone
who reads print why keeping the format in tact for the recent members
would be beneficial, the only format that keeps the print in tact is KES
and that is not a universal file. I hope I have answered your question If
you have further questions or would like to further discuss this topic
please email me off list.
Anastasia
Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
To unsubscribe from this list send a blank Email to
bksvol-discuss-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put the word 'unsubscribe' by itself in the subject line. To get a list
of available commands, put the word 'help' by itself in the subject line.