On 24 Dec, John Norris wrote in message <644df57a54.John@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > In message <mpro.nh2anm0f79xii025g.lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Steve Fryatt <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > I remain convinced that it's the Panda itself which is hiccuping. > > > I'm afraid that (in the sense I think you mean) seems unlikely. The > > problem is almost certainly code: remember that the Pi has a totally > > different generation of ARM processor to the Panda, and has fewer traps > > for legacy code (because its instruction set is older). That by itself > > will almost certainly make the Pi seem more stable, as it contains fewer > > potential incompatibilities for code which hasn't been updated. > > I'm not sure I've quite understood this. Is it the Pi that has the older > instruction set, as implied, or the Panda? The Pi, obviously: it has the older generation processor of the two. -- Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/ --- To alter your preferences or leave the group, visit //www.freelists.org/list/armini-support List-related queries to info@xxxxxxxxxxxx