Arachne at FreeLists---The Arachne Fan Club! On Fri, 06 Oct 2006 19:35:50 -0500, Jason Dodd wrote: > Sure, dos is faster on the same machine as windows, os x, or linux. Even > when > it doesn't appear so, they are all doing more things at the same time than > dos > would be for the same task. Although you can make a nice gui desktop with > linux > that compares quite well with a dos machine in terms of speed. My dos > machine > has lots of *nix commands and I'm using a bash shell so it feels a lot like > linux but I do miss the multitasking. I'm looking into some task switchers > to > see how they'll do but at this point I keep thinking I wonder how I used to > live > having only one app running at a time. I prefer multitasking by using two computers, each with only one task to look after <GGGGGGG> I have a copy of "The Idiots Guide To Linux" and the CD-ROM that I intend to install one day.... when I get a round tuit..... BasicLinux is already installed on this computer, but I never seem to find time to study it and learn to use it..... . ,-./\ . / \ from Greg Mayman, in Adelaide, South Australia . \_,-*_/ "Queen City of The South" 34:55 S 138:36 E . v Arachne at FreeLists -- Arachne, The Premier GPL Web Browser/Suite for DOS --