[access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming

  • From: "Sunil" <bosley20@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 5 Sep 2005 15:13:14 +0100

I can't quite see how Andrew's comments are relevant but there you go.



-----Original Message-----
From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Dj Paddy
Sent: 05 September 2005 15:01
To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming


Like it or not please folow it.

It's not up for debate.

Quoting, when to quote how to quote is a personal thing And one we've not on

this list stibulated a standard for.

|Let me try and give you one final exampel Sunil.

Somebody asks a question on Podcasts.

Now you may have all you want to know on the subject so you delete that 
conversational thread.

But lurking under there was a post from someone who altered the subject 
field and answered a question you've been trying to get answered for a while

on a related or nonrelated issue.

You've missed that tip because the person did not take the two seconds if 
usign OE to hit ctrl n and type a new message.

It makes sense as well as perhaps being geeky, news groupy.

Andrews comments especially that were he gives the analogy of being in a 
room and people begin talking at once about different topics is a very 
accurate one.

Dj Paddy
"It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion,
It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,
The hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning,
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion."
-- Popular Usenet Sig
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sunil" <bosley20@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2005 2:30 PM
Subject: [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming


> Its geeky tyranny
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Hodgson [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Andrew Hodgson
> Sent: 05 September 2005 14:25
> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject 
> naming
>
>
> Hi Sunil,
>
> I don't believe you can just brush netiquette off the table in this
> manner.
> Imagine for example that if you are in a room, everyone in the room spoke 
> to
> you differently, expected certain things from you, etc, you would soon 
> find
> issues.  Ensuring that on lists such as this people follow some simple
> guidelines will make things much easier down the line.  I know I brushed
> against netiquette for a few years with my top posting protest, but after
> realising that people were not able to take full advantage of the time I
> spent into writing such messages etc, I decided to follow the convension.
>
> Now taking Barry's original request into account - people who group by 
> conversation are likely to miss several important and useful messages 
> because people don't do a simple task of starting a new _thread_ when 
> the subject changes.  Something that only takes the person who changes 
> the subject a few seconds to perform, but would benefit so many more 
> people.
>
> Thanks.
> Andrew.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Sunil
> Sent: Mon 05/09/2005 14:14
> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more:  Subject naming
>
> Ray, I'm not quite sure what your point is here, but personally, who 
> cares about people who sort their messages by conversation? All this 
> netiquette stuff geeky and unnecessary. The subjectline makes clear 
> what the message is about (it does in my experience of being on this 
> list anyway) so if you're not interested, don't read it!
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
> Behalf
> Of
> Ray's Home
> Sent: 05 September 2005 14:06
> To: access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
>
>
> Barry, I've tried to observe good netiquette in this field, as when I
> posted
> this morning about the Dailly Telegraph Bootcamp series, which would have
> sat oddly in the middle of a conversation about backing up Outlook files.
>
> I find it equally frustrating when a thread starts that I'm not 
> greatly interested in, only to mutate into something entirely 
> different that I am interested in, except that, by then, I've decided 
> to ignore it and it passes me by.  Like most here, I cannot, and do 
> not read everything.  I thought, and I might be wrong, that when a 
> subject line is changed one should mention
> it in the body of the text, at the start of a message, and I will own up 
> to
> not always doing that.
>
> I often take the liberty too of lopping off the earlier parts of a 
> conversation that maybe go back days.  One of the pains of 'top 
> posting' as I belive its called is, not just reading the conversation 
> backwards, but all
> the greater than or other indent signs you get as you move down the 
> message,
> not to mention the seemingly enldessly repeated group message at the end.
> That of course eventually makes the message too long to be accepted by the
> server, or for those apparantly in digest mode, although I don't quite
> understand the last.
>
> One final moane, and please list owner, don't come back at me and say 
> 'boring' but surely most here can send thank you messages off list.  
> Well, that's what I tend to do. Ray
>
> Personal emails:  Email me at
> mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dj Paddy"
>
> | Hi all.
> |
> | Please please please please please!
> |
> | Don't just rename/add/edit a subject field start a new, brand new 
> | mailing even if it's only a word to add to the subject field.
> |
> | For anyone grouping by conversation whither their using OE or other 
> | mail clients this makes things a nightmare and they may miss the 
> | subject if
> their
> | not interested in that thread but may be interested in what it' 
> | sbeen developed into. Barry
> |
>
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
>
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
>
>
> ** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
> ** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> ** and in the Subject line type
> ** unsubscribe
> ** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
> ** immediately-following link:-
> ** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
> ** or send a message, to
> ** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
>
>
> __________ NOD32 1.1208 (20050902) Information __________
>
> This message was checked by NOD32 antivirus system. 
> http://www.eset.com
>
> 

** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq



** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq

Other related posts: