[access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: "Ray's Home" <rays-home@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <access-uk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 01:35:24 +0100
I'd like to add my appreciation for the explanations given, and as Kevin says,
"the problem i've found as a list owner and | moderator is a lot of folks are
simply too bone idol to think about it like
| that. no offense meant to anyone in particular, but it's the truth! ..."
I can understand the frustration being expressed here, but many of us do not
take kindly to being told 'that's the rules, and do it because I say so.' A
rational explanation influences me a great deal more than being spoken to in an
officious and mildly offensive way. There should be rules of conduct for
moderators? (smile)
So, do not get me wrong, I am saying thanks to everyone who has explained the
rationale behind starting a new subject as against merely using the original as
a convenient way of getting the group email address into a message.
Ray
Personal emails: Email me at
mailto:ray-48@xxxxxxxx
----- Original Message -----
** To leave the list, click on the immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe]
** If this link doesn't work then send a message to:
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
** and in the Subject line type
** unsubscribe
** For other list commands such as vacation mode, click on the
** immediately-following link:-
** [mailto:access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=faq]
** or send a message, to
** access-uk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with the Subject:- faq
- Follow-Ups:
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: Peter Logue
- References:
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: George Bell
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: kevin and emma
Other related posts:
- » [access-uk] Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- » [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: Peter Logue
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: George Bell
- [access-uk] Re: Moderators request once more: Subject naming
- From: kevin and emma