--- On Mon, 4/26/10, iro3isdx <wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote: > > You have provide a formal argument. That is, your argument amounts to > a mere mechanical manipulation of meaningless marks. At the beginning of his argument, Joe clearly defines the meanings of the marks in plain English. Where you and I see those meaningful English definitions, software/hardware systems see more meaningless marks. We could check Joe's formal proof on a computer. Assuming Joe got his logic right, the computer would prove that computers do not understand what they prove. -gts ========================================= Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/