[Wittrs] Re: The CRA in Symbolic Form (According to Joe)
- From: "iro3isdx" <xznwrjnk-evca@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: wittrsamr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2010 15:39:48 -0000
--- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Joseph Polanik <jPolanik@...> wrote:
> Formalization of CRA
Let me see if I understand what you have done.
You have provide a formal argument. That is, your argument amounts to
a mere mechanical manipulation of meaningless marks.
On the basis of that syntactic argument you reach a semantic
conclusion. And that semantic conclusion is that syntactic arguments
cannot lead to semantic conclusions.
It seems to be a mind boggling example of a self-refuting argument.
Regards,
Neil
=========================================
Need Something? Check here: http://ludwig.squarespace.com/wittrslinks/
Other related posts:
