I don't think there is a gender difference. When I led tours I had some great spotters of both genders. I also have seen some birders that can't see a bird teed up on a fence post out in the open. Some of it is just a gift of inherent ability. Mark Korducki, New Berlin Sent from my U.S. Cellular BlackBerry® smartphone -----Original Message----- From: Andrea Szymczak <harrierhawk1@xxxxxxxxxxx> Sender: wisbirdn-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 18:22:25 To: <wisbirdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reply-To: harrierhawk1@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [wisb] Men vs. Women - Which of us sees the birds better? Before the expected front moves through and lights up this listserv with many new species reports, I wondered what we all think about this question....... I've always thought that men often seem to VISUALLY detect birds before women do. Perhaps it has something to do with our ancestors hunting and having to see a potential meal camouflaged in various backgrounds? Personally, I rely more on my hearing to help me locate birds. That having been said, I remember Bill Cowart once telling me that women's visual acuity was better and that they could often see distant approaching hawks before the men could. Opinions? Andrea Szymczak Waukesha, WI #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn. To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn. Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn. #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn. To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn. Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn.