> ************************************************** ********** > cabehogan@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on 9/5/2001 > ************************************************** ********** > > As to your other point - I am not all that keen > on the idea that M$ can and will, be able to get > into my computer, keep track of me, etc. I know > what they say, I know their protestations of > innocence and good will and how this will make > everything soooo much easier. Easier isn't always > better, and, if this becomes the standard, I will > have a LOT less control over my personal > information - from the hardware I own down to how > I use my computer and where I go on the internet. > If I wanted Bill Gates in my house, I'd invite him > over. If I can NOT turn off their nosing around > in my computer, then it is not a feature or a > benefit, it's the first step to Big Brother. > Personally, I really could care less so long as > they don't muck up my system, I don't mind sharing > at all, but it must be done on request and a > pretty please with sugar on it wouldn't hurt! ; ) > *** Good luck getting a please or sugar or anything else outta Bill and M$. HeeHee, of course I don't expect to get it, I just said that it wouldn't hurt! ; ) > If you trust him and his vast network of employees to be able to access your computer whenever it's on, more power to ya. And, you *did* know that this software allows for remote control by another user, right? They're pushing that as meaning that a remote tech can take control of your computer and fix it. Yes I did as I have (long ago in the past on another machine) had it worked on twice via that route and it worked out just fine and I thought that it was neat! > My answer is - if I can't follow the instructions and make it work, then I need a live body, not remote control. Not to mention - the crackers will have a hey day with this. Considering all the cracks and security holes that crackers can find now, the viruses, etc., do you *really* think that this "feature" is worth the risk? I have never been bothered by the viruses or hackers and since my experience with the feature was satisfactory and the viruses and hackers stay at bay, then I think it is expecially for folks that are not too good at following instructions! > > Also, if you support this monopoly, then you > will become increasingly dependent on M$. You > will NOT own XP, you will pony up whatever the > renewal fee is in 2 years - and without > competition, M$ has the upper hand. > But I thought that I was already dependent on them > to a point by having to use their Knowledge Base > to find information that is not within my own Help > files included with the software! I WILL if I buy > it or I won't buy it! As for any renewal fee, > that is out when I buy it as it will belong to me > then! And besides, they ain't the only pusher on > the block! ; ) > ***NO, as a matter of fact, you will NOT own it. You will have a lease agreement. You cannot resell it, you cannot give it away. You can keep it until it expires and then you can re-up your sub. And if all your records - financial, personal, etc. - were created in M$ products, there are NO guarantees that, should you decide to let your lease lapse and try someone new, you will be *able* to transfer your records without a LOT of headaches. I knew of the resell or give away, but the rest I was not aware of, (I guess I missed reading those specifications in all that I have read so far), so that will let me out of the chase as I have no intentions of leasing anything! If I don't have the money to buy it, I'll just do without it till I do! > My company is likely to go to XP, but I personally will not. I don't blame you if it can't be bought as you are saying above! .......clarence....... > Pamela UNSUBSCRIBE by sending email to triadtechtalk-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with unsubscribe in the Subject field. To VIEW/CHANGE your subscription status go to //www.freelists.org/webpage/triadtechtalk