[THIN] Re: SATA drives

  • From: "richard van beers" <richard.van.beers@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2006 12:39:06 +0200

Everyone has assholes and opinions.

Citrix uses less bw than TS, clearly in a thin client env. TS RDP is
teh bottleneck.

So there is no use for plain TS systems?

Of course there is!

If I need a system to supply 10 users with ms office, and they need it
on the cheap, a single proc system with 1 gb, and a mirrored sata
drive is "good enough" and will save me 100's on scsi.

so, there. :)

On 10/3/06, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>"There might be times when a *subpar* system is "good enough". Often,
actually. "

I think that's short sighted and shooting yourself in the foot before you
even get off the ground

;)

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf
Of richard van beers
Sent: 03 October 2006 09:38
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: SATA drives

> I'm sorry there is no good arguement for going SATA over SCSI in a TS
> environment.  It's short sighted and your shooting yourself in the
> foot before you even get off the ground.


Oh cool! A strong opinion and I disagree! (Just slightly)

There might be times when a subpar system is "good enough". Often, actually.
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode
use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************

Other related posts: