Does anyone have any thoughts about which Novell integration route is better -- the ZENWorks/Dynamic Local User route or the simultaneous Windows 2000 domain route with dual accounts? I've got a school I'm working with, approximately 1500 students with the environment holding anywhere from 150-200 concurrent sessions. We're still in the 'testing' phase, so we can still go either route for deployment. My problem with the Windows 2000/Novell route is that they're going to have to create two accounts for every student, we're going to have to sync/reset all their passwords, and they're going to have one more point of failure (if the DC goes down). Honestly, I need to read up a bit more on how the ZENWorks deal works, but if its creating a dynamic local user, my thought is how are roaming profiles going to work? Anyway, has anyone had the opportunity to take a look at both of these pieces and examine the advantages/disadvantages to both? From the Advanced Guide for FR3, I saw the integration steps for them both, but if I remember correctly, it didn't state advantages/disadvantages to either. Thanks in advance, Craig ******************************************************** This Week's Sponsor: ThinPrint http://www.thinprint.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thethin.net/links.cfm For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm