[tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38

  • From: Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx>
  • To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:17:12 -0700

That is a  very cool video

Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device

"Ryan G. Coleman" <ryan.g.coleman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>I shot the Daire Aire drag race at 240 fps. My Camera goes up to 1000
>fps, but at that rate you only get a tiny amount of pixels...
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OxyZOSqxP8
>
>-Ryan
>
>On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Whys that? I'm only simming 150+ gees... lol
>>
>> Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Anyone have a high speed video camera for the launch?  We will need it to 
>>>declare a winner...
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>>Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 6:23 PM
>>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>
>>>I will
>>>
>>>Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>So are still doing a 54mm min díameter drag at OS
>>>>
>>>>Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device
>>>>
>>>>Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will
>>>>>hold it. I'm game for any motor
>>>>>
>>>>>Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>3 grain vmaxes?  CTI J1520
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM
>>>>>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and 
>>>>>>even those will get close.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Can we do 54mm?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime?  I still haven't posted 
>>>>>>>> the numbers you have Chris!  And you got your rocket back?  I would be 
>>>>>>>> very pleased.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM
>>>>>>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> > Wow.  Still some excellent numbers.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris
>>>>>>>> > Franco
>>>>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM
>>>>>>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket that 
>>>>>>>> > flew Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The 
>>>>>>>> > rocket corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly 
>>>>>>>> > straight its previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 
>>>>>>>> > seconds out of the tower, hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed 
>>>>>>>> > of 1353 mph at 679 ft. The rocket only got to 11,693 agl. I was 
>>>>>>>> > hoping for 16,000. The coning killed much of my performance. 
>>>>>>>> > Although I got a little more altitude, I got more speed on a 3g 
>>>>>>>> > skidmark I than I did with the 5g full I motor. I will fly again 
>>>>>>>> > soon and hope for a better flight.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said there
>>>>>>>> >> is no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer is yes
>>>>>>>> >> children under
>>>>>>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High Power
>>>>>>>> >> flyer
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High
>>>>>>>> >> Power Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may
>>>>>>>> >> escort and be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR
>>>>>>>> >> fliers in the High Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is
>>>>>>>> >> required to monitor the actions of the escorted non-HPR fliers,
>>>>>>>> >> and the escort is fully responsible for those actions and for the 
>>>>>>>> >> safety of those escorted.
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I thought
>>>>>>>> >> different myself
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >> Jack G
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Other related posts: