I will Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx> wrote: >So are still doing a 54mm min díameter drag at OS > >Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device > >Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will hold it. >>I'm game for any motor >> >>Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>3 grain vmaxes? CTI J1520 >>> >>> >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco >>>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM >>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 >>> >>>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and even >>>those will get close. >>> >>>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>Can we do 54mm? >>>> >>>> >>>>Sent from my iPhone >>>> >>>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime? I still haven't posted the >>>>> numbers you have Chris! And you got your rocket back? I would be very >>>>> pleased. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Karl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx> >>>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM >>>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 >>>>> >>>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack >>>>> >>>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S >>>>> >>>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> > Wow. Still some excellent numbers. >>>>> > >>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco >>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM >>>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38 >>>>> > >>>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket that >>>>> > flew Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The rocket >>>>> > corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly straight its >>>>> > previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 seconds out of the >>>>> > tower, hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed of 1353 mph at 679 ft. >>>>> > The rocket only got to 11,693 agl. I was hoping for 16,000. The coning >>>>> > killed much of my performance. Although I got a little more altitude, I >>>>> > got more speed on a 3g skidmark I than I did with the 5g full I motor. >>>>> > I will fly again soon and hope for a better flight. >>>>> > >>>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said there is >>>>> >> no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer is yes >>>>> >> children under >>>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High Power >>>>> >> flyer >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High Power >>>>> >> Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may escort and >>>>> >> be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR fliers in the High >>>>> >> Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is required to monitor the >>>>> >> actions of the escorted non-HPR fliers, and the escort is fully >>>>> >> responsible for those actions and for the safety of those escorted. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I thought >>>>> >> different myself >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Jack G >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>> >>>