[tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
- From: Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx>
- To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 17:47:32 -0700
So are still doing a 54mm min díameter drag at OS
Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device
Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will hold it.
>I'm game for any motor
>
>Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>3 grain vmaxes? CTI J1520
>>
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM
>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>
>>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and even
>>those will get close.
>>
>>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>Can we do 54mm?
>>>
>>>
>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime? I still haven't posted the
>>>> numbers you have Chris! And you got your rocket back? I would be very
>>>> pleased.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Karl
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx>
>>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM
>>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>>
>>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S
>>>>
>>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Wow. Still some excellent numbers.
>>>> >
>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM
>>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38
>>>> >
>>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket that
>>>> > flew Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The rocket
>>>> > corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly straight its
>>>> > previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 seconds out of the
>>>> > tower, hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed of 1353 mph at 679 ft.
>>>> > The rocket only got to 11,693 agl. I was hoping for 16,000. The coning
>>>> > killed much of my performance. Although I got a little more altitude, I
>>>> > got more speed on a 3g skidmark I than I did with the 5g full I motor. I
>>>> > will fly again soon and hope for a better flight.
>>>> >
>>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said there is
>>>> >> no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer is yes
>>>> >> children under
>>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High Power
>>>> >> flyer
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High Power
>>>> >> Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may escort and
>>>> >> be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR fliers in the High
>>>> >> Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is required to monitor the
>>>> >> actions of the escorted non-HPR fliers, and the escort is fully
>>>> >> responsible for those actions and for the safety of those escorted.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I thought
>>>> >> different myself
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Jack G
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>
>>
Other related posts:
