[tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
- From: "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 22:00:17 -0700
240 should be great. This isn?t Mythbusters...
-----Original Message-----
From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ryan G. Coleman
Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:50 PM
To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
I shot the Daire Aire drag race at 240 fps. My Camera goes up to 1000 fps,
but at that rate you only get a tiny amount of pixels...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3OxyZOSqxP8
-Ryan
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> Whys that? I'm only simming 150+ gees... lol
>
> Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Anyone have a high speed video camera for the launch? We will need it to
declare a winner...
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 6:23 PM
>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>
>>I will
>>
>>Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>>So are still doing a 54mm min díameter drag at OS
>>>
>>>Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device
>>>
>>>Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>>If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will
>>>>hold it. I'm game for any motor
>>>>
>>>>Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>3 grain vmaxes? CTI J1520
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM
>>>>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>>>
>>>>>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and
even those will get close.
>>>>>
>>>>>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>Can we do 54mm?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>>
>>>>>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime? I still haven't posted
the numbers you have Chris! And you got your rocket back? I would be very
pleased.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Karl
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM
>>>>>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> > Wow. Still some excellent numbers.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris
>>>>>>> > Franco
>>>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM
>>>>>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket
that flew Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The rocket
corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly straight its
previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 seconds out of the tower,
hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed of 1353 mph at 679 ft. The rocket
only got to 11,693 agl. I was hoping for 16,000. The coning killed much of
my performance. Although I got a little more altitude, I got more speed on a
3g skidmark I than I did with the 5g full I motor. I will fly again soon and
hope for a better flight.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said
>>>>>>> >> there is no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer
>>>>>>> >> is yes children under
>>>>>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High
>>>>>>> >> Power flyer
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High
>>>>>>> >> Power Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may
>>>>>>> >> escort and be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR
>>>>>>> >> fliers in the High Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is
>>>>>>> >> required to monitor the actions of the escorted non-HPR
>>>>>>> >> fliers, and the escort is fully responsible for those actions and
for the safety of those escorted.
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I
>>>>>>> >> thought different myself
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >> Jack G
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>
>>
Other related posts:
