[tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
- From: Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx>
- To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 21:24:05 -0700
If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will hold it.
I'm game for any motor
Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>3 grain vmaxes? CTI J1520
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM
>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>
>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and even
>those will get close.
>
>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Can we do 54mm?
>>
>>
>>Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime? I still haven't posted the
>>> numbers you have Chris! And you got your rocket back? I would be very
>>> pleased.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Karl
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx>
>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM
>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38
>>>
>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack
>>>
>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S
>>>
>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Wow. Still some excellent numbers.
>>> >
>>> > -----Original Message-----
>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco
>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM
>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38
>>> >
>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket that flew
>>> > Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The rocket
>>> > corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly straight its
>>> > previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 seconds out of the
>>> > tower, hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed of 1353 mph at 679 ft.
>>> > The rocket only got to 11,693 agl. I was hoping for 16,000. The coning
>>> > killed much of my performance. Although I got a little more altitude, I
>>> > got more speed on a 3g skidmark I than I did with the 5g full I motor. I
>>> > will fly again soon and hope for a better flight.
>>> >
>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said there is
>>> >> no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer is yes
>>> >> children under
>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High Power
>>> >> flyer
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High Power
>>> >> Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may escort and
>>> >> be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR fliers in the High
>>> >> Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is required to monitor the
>>> >> actions of the escorted non-HPR fliers, and the escort is fully
>>> >> responsible for those actions and for the safety of those escorted.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I thought
>>> >> different myself
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Jack G
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>>
>
>
Other related posts:
