Should I pot the whole altimeter? -----Original Message----- From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 9:45 PM To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 Whys that? I'm only simming 150+ gees... lol Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Anyone have a high speed video camera for the launch? We will need it to >declare a winner... > >-----Original Message----- >From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco >Sent: Saturday, August 25, 2012 6:23 PM >To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 > >I will > >Jimmy Franco <Aldocyber3@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >>So are still doing a 54mm min díameter drag at OS >> >>Sent from my Virgin Mobile Android-Powered Device >> >>Chris Franco <chvy91bowtie@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>>If were talking vmax we could go up to the 2045 and the waiver will >>>hold it. I'm game for any motor >>> >>>Rob Diehl <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>>3 grain vmaxes? CTI J1520 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>[mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Franco >>>>Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 12:27 PM >>>>To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 >>>> >>>>Let's do it. I think the biggest motor our waiver will hold is a 3g and >>>>even those will get close. >>>> >>>>James Dougherty <jafrado@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Can we do 54mm? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Sent from my iPhone >>>>> >>>>>On May 23, 2012, at 5:27 AM, Karl Baumheckel <karlbaum@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Maybe we should drag min diam 38s sometime? I still haven't posted the >>>>>> numbers you have Chris! And you got your rocket back? I would be very >>>>>> pleased. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Karl >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: "JACK GARIBALDI" <JackGaribaldi@xxxxxxx> >>>>>> To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> Cc: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 10:22:05 PM >>>>>> Subject: [tccrockets] Re: The Crow 38 >>>>>> >>>>>> 12,000 on an I motor nothing to complain about for sure Jack >>>>>> >>>>>> Sent from my Mil Spec IPhone 4S >>>>>> >>>>>> On May 22, 2012, at 10:16 PM, "Rob Diehl" <rwdiehl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> > Wow. Still some excellent numbers. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > -----Original Message----- >>>>>> > From: tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> > [mailto:tccrockets-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris >>>>>> > Franco >>>>>> > Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:15 PM >>>>>> > To: tccrockets@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>>>> > Subject: [tccrockets] The Crow 38 >>>>>> > >>>>>> > I was finally able to check out my numbers on my Crow 38 rocket that >>>>>> > flew Saturday on an I540. Very disappointing but still cool. The >>>>>> > rocket corkscrewed badly out of the tower after flying perfectly >>>>>> > straight its previous 3 flights. It pulled 93.77 gees for .81 seconds >>>>>> > out of the tower, hit mach at 207 ft and hit its max speed of 1353 mph >>>>>> > at 679 ft. The rocket only got to 11,693 agl. I was hoping for 16,000. >>>>>> > The coning killed much of my performance. Although I got a little more >>>>>> > altitude, I got more speed on a 3g skidmark I than I did with the 5g >>>>>> > full I motor. I will fly again soon and hope for a better flight. >>>>>> > >>>>>> > Jack Garibaldi <jackgaribaldi@xxxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>> > >>>>>> >> Robin Meredith from the Tripoli board responded and said there >>>>>> >> is no age limitation under rule 2-18.1.1 so the answer is yes >>>>>> >> children under >>>>>> >> 18 can go on the High Power range when escorted by a High >>>>>> >> Power flyer >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> 2-18.1.1 Exception: Non-HPR Fliers are allowed in the High >>>>>> >> Power Launch Area if escorted by a HPR Flier. A HPR Flier may >>>>>> >> escort and be accompanied by not more than two (2) non-HPR >>>>>> >> fliers in the High Power Launch Area. The HPR flier escort is >>>>>> >> required to monitor the actions of the escorted non-HPR >>>>>> >> fliers, and the escort is fully responsible for those actions and for >>>>>> >> the safety of those escorted. >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Glad I asked because that was very contradicting and I thought >>>>>> >> different myself >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> Jack G >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> >> >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>> >>>> > >