[sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
- From: "Richard Monjure" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rca6u@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 09:42:23 -0700 (PDT)
What the fuck? How did I get on this fucking list again?!!
Moderator, please take me off!
Rich
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then?
As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now.The danger
is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain to do sometime
in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now. The problem, like so
many problems these days is being handled by kicking the can down the road for
the next president or the next generation to deal with.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
>From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx"
>Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM
>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100
> s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>
>
>Stan,
>
>I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors the
>rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to leave
>earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and gravity
>would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it anywhere
>else, though its not rocket science.
>
>JS
>
>
>---------- Original Message ----------
>From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx"
>for DMARC)
>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s
>Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
>
>
>JS
>Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the
>handeling and polluting space
>plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you have a
>great idea. Is
>it original or you read it somewhere?
>
>Comrade B
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm
>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s
>Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>
>
>RR
>
>You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be necessary.
>Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending them into the
>sun would solve our problem.
>
>js
>
>
>---------- Original Message ----------
>From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s
>Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
>
>JS,
>The contaminated water is being stored in thousandsof big storage tanks which
>would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not a practical
>solution on multiple levels.
>
>Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but itlooks
>like it will destroy the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be
>the means by which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves,
>accidentally through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war.
>
>-RR
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>>From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>>Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM
>>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s
>>Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>
>>
>>One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun. Launch technology is so
>>good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of catastrophic
>>failure on launch are pretty minimal. If this policy were adopted, our
>>nuclear waste problem would be solved. Of course the "environmental" assholes
>>would go ballistic. But that's apolitical problem that any faculty lounge
>>prognosticator should be able to deal with.
>>
>>JS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>---------- Original Message ----------
>>From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx"
>>for DMARC)
>>To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>Radioactive W...
>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>
>>
>>RR
>>I agree with you 100% on this one.
>>
>>Comrade B
>>
>>In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>There's a showon HBO called "VICE" thatis currently airing a report on
>>Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is
>>realbecause if it is then the horrors to come are beyond imagining. But then,
>>what they have done so far is almost beyond imagining, having built several
>>square miles of tank farms to hold contaminated water with no way to dispose
>>of it and with no end in sight. You would think that after all this time
>>somebody would have come up with a way to deal with radioactive waste.
>>>
>>>-RR
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM
>>>>To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>>>Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Ron G,
>>>>
>>>>Here's the article directly from the Japan Times. Read it carefully.
>>>>
>>>>http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM
>>>>
>>>>Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary.
>>>>
>>>>According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released was
>>>>captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it could
>>>>settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors. Letting the runoff
>>>>water reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so the idea
>>>>is to capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach the
>>>>reactor basement. It's tested before release to confirm that it's within
>>>>safety levels for radiation.
>>>>
>>>>I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder is
>>>>not honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article.
>>>>
>>>>Kelly A.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>________________________________
>>>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700
>>>>From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx
>>>>To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>>>Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From
>>>>Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>
>>>> By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014
>>>>
>>>>According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive water
>>>>into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that
>>>>for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of radioactive
>>>>water to be released into the ocean every single day…
>>>>And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has
>>>>been getting into the seafood being sold in North America.
>>>>
>>>>For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was
>>>>being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was
>>>>selling to Canada…
>>>>
>>>>• 73 percent of the mackerel
>>>>
>>>>• 91 percent of the halibut
>>>>
>>>>• 92 percent of the sardines
>>>>
>>>>• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
>>>>
>>>>• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
>>>>
>>>>• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
>>>>
>>>>So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada?
>>>>
>>>>Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high
>>>>school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores
>>>>for radioactive contamination. What she found was absolutely stunning…
>>>>
>>>>A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that
>>>>her school science project would make headlines all over the world.
>>>>But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter
>>>>purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery
>>>>stores
>>>>for radioactive contamination. What she discovered was absolutely
>>>>stunning. Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made in
>>>>China,
>>>>tested very high for radiation. So is this being caused by nuclear
>>>>radiation from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to give
>>>>us cancer
>>>>and other diseases?
>>>>
>>>>Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here:
>>>>
>>>>http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific
>>>>
>>>...
>>
>>____________________________________________________________
>>The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
>>Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
>>FixYourBloodSugar.com
>...
...
Other related posts:
