Strange, the email address to Richard Monjure was rejected, how'd that happen? Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Technical details of permanent failure: Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the recipient domain freelists.org byturing.freelists.org. [206.53.239.180]. The error that the other server returned was: 550 5.1.1 <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table 73 DR On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > We needed a balanced reasoned voice, RM. Welcome back. > > I do like the the special email address you acquired. Nice. > > 73 > > DR > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Richard Monjure < > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> What the fuck? How did I get on this fucking list again?!! >> >> Moderator, please take me off! >> >> Rich >> >> >> On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> >> >> Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then? >> >> As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now. The >> danger is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain >> to do sometime in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now. >> The problem, like so many problems these days is being handled by >> kicking the can down the road for the next president or the next generation >> to deal with. >> >> -RR >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" >> Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM >> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping >> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... >> >> Stan, >> >> I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors >> the rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to >> leave earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and >> gravity would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it >> anywhere else, though its not rocket science. >> >> JS >> >> >> ---------- Original Message ---------- >> From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender " >> sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC) >> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping >> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... >> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT) >> >> JS >> Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the >> handeling and polluting space >> plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you >> have a great idea. Is >> it original or you read it somewhere? >> >> Comrade B >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> >> To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping >> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... >> >> RR >> >> You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be >> necessary. Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending >> them into the sun would solve our problem. >> >> js >> >> >> ---------- Original Message ---------- >> From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping >> 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... >> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00) >> >> JS, >> The contaminated water is being stored in thousands of big storage tanks >> which would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not >> a practical solution on multiple levels. >> >> Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but itlooks >> like it will destroy >> the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be the means by >> which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves, accidentally >> through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war. >> >> -RR >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> >> Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM >> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping >> 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... >> >> One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun. Launch technology >> is so good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of >> catastrophic failure on launch are pretty minimal. If this policy were >> adopted, our nuclear waste problem would be solved. Of course the >> "environmental" assholes would go ballistic. But that's apolitical problem >> that any faculty lounge prognosticator should be able to deal with. >> >> JS >> >> >> >> >> ---------- Original Message ---------- >> From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender " >> Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC) >> To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of >> Radioactive W... >> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT) >> >> >> RR >> I agree with you 100% on this one. >> >> Comrade B >> >> In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, >> ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: >> >> There's a showon HBO called "VICE" that is currently airing a report on >> Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is >> realbecause if it is then the horrors >> to come are beyond imagining. But then, what they have done so far is >> almost beyond imagining, having built several square miles of tank farms >> to hold contaminated water with no way to dispose of it and with no end >> in sight. You would think that after all this time somebody would have >> come up with a way to deal with radioactive waste. >> >> -RR >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM >> To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of >> Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific >> >> Ron G, >> >> Here's the article directly from the Japan Times. Read it carefully. >> >> >> http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM >> >> Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary. >> >> According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released >> was captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it >> could settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors. Letting the >> runoff water reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so >> the idea is to capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach >> the reactor basement. It's tested before release to confirm that it's >> within safety levels for radiation. >> >> I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder >> is not honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article. >> >> Kelly A. >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700 >> From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx >> To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of >> Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific >> >> >> Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From >> Fukushima Into The Pacific >> >> By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014 >> >> According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive >> water into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that >> for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of >> radioactive water to be released into the ocean every single day… >> And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has >> been getting into the seafood being sold in North America. >> >> For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was >> being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was >> selling to Canada… >> >> • 73 percent of the mackerel >> >> • 91 percent of the halibut >> >> • 92 percent of the sardines >> >> • 93 percent of the tuna and eel >> >> • 94 percent of the cod and anchovies >> >> • 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish >> >> So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada? >> >> Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high >> school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores >> for radioactive contamination. What she found was absolutely stunning… >> >> A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that >> her school science project would make headlines all over the world. >> But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter >> purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery >> stores >> for radioactive contamination. What she discovered was absolutely >> stunning. *Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were >> made in China, * >> *tested very high for radiation. * So is this being caused by nuclear >> radiation from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to give >> us cancer >> and other diseases? >> >> Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here: >> >> >> http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific >> >> ... >> >> >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?* >> Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!) >> <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc> >> FixYourBloodSugar.com<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc> >> >> ... >> >> ... >> >> >> >> >