[sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...

  • From: "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 14:08:31 -0400

Strange, the email address to Richard Monjure was rejected, how'd that
happen?

Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:

     dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
the recipient domain freelists.org byturing.freelists.org. [206.53.239.180].

The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.1.1 <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient table

73
DR


On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> We needed a balanced reasoned voice, RM.  Welcome back.
>
> I do like the the special email address you acquired.  Nice.
>
> 73
>
> DR
>
>
> On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Richard Monjure <
> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> What the fuck?  How did I get on this fucking list again?!!
>>
>> Moderator, please take me off!
>>
>> Rich
>>
>>
>>   On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then?
>>
>> As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now. The
>> danger is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain
>> to do sometime in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now.
>> The problem, like so many problems these days is being handled by
>> kicking the can down the road for the next president or the next generation
>> to deal with.
>>
>> -RR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx"
>> Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM
>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>
>> Stan,
>>
>> I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors
>> the rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to
>> leave earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and
>> gravity would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it
>> anywhere else, though its not rocket science.
>>
>> JS
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original Message ----------
>> From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "
>> sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>> JS
>> Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the
>> handeling and polluting space
>> plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you
>> have a great idea. Is
>> it original or you read it somewhere?
>>
>> Comrade B
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>> To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>> 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>
>> RR
>>
>> You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be
>> necessary. Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending
>> them into the sun would solve our problem.
>>
>> js
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original Message ----------
>> From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>> 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
>>
>> JS,
>> The contaminated water is being stored in thousands of big storage tanks
>> which would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not
>> a practical solution on multiple levels.
>>
>> Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but itlooks 
>> like it will destroy
>> the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be the means by
>> which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves, accidentally
>> through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war.
>>
>> -RR
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM
>> To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>> 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>
>> One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun.  Launch technology
>> is so good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of
>> catastrophic failure on launch are pretty  minimal. If this policy were
>> adopted, our nuclear waste problem would be solved. Of course the
>> "environmental" assholes would go ballistic. But that's apolitical problem
>> that any faculty lounge prognosticator should be able to deal with.
>>
>> JS
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------- Original Message ----------
>> From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "
>> Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
>> To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>> Radioactive W...
>> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
>>
>>
>> RR
>> I agree with you 100% on this one.
>>
>> Comrade B
>>
>> In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>> ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>
>> There's a showon HBO called "VICE" that is currently airing a report on
>> Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is 
>> realbecause if it is then the horrors
>> to come are beyond imagining. But then, what they have done so far is
>> almost beyond imagining, having built several square miles of tank farms
>> to hold contaminated water with no way to dispose of it and with no end
>> in sight. You would think that after all this time somebody would have
>> come up with a way to deal with radioactive waste.
>>
>> -RR
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM
>> To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>> Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>
>> Ron G,
>>
>> Here's the article directly from the Japan Times.  Read it carefully.
>>
>>
>> http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM
>>
>> Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary.
>>
>> According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released
>> was captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it
>> could settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors.  Letting the
>> runoff water reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so
>> the idea is to capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach
>> the reactor basement.  It's tested before release to confirm that it's
>> within safety levels for radiation.
>>
>> I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder
>> is not honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article.
>>
>> Kelly A.
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700
>> From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx
>> To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>> Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>
>>
>> Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From
>> Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>
>>  By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014
>>
>> According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive
>> water into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that
>> for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of
>> radioactive water to be released into the ocean every single day…
>> And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has
>> been getting into the seafood being sold in North America.
>>
>> For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was
>> being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was
>> selling to Canada…
>>
>> • 73 percent of the mackerel
>>
>> • 91 percent of the halibut
>>
>> • 92 percent of the sardines
>>
>> • 93 percent of the tuna and eel
>>
>> • 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
>>
>> • 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
>>
>> So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada?
>>
>> Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high
>> school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores
>> for radioactive contamination.  What she found was absolutely stunning…
>>
>> A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that
>> her school science project would make headlines all over the world.
>> But that is precisely what has happened.  Using a $600 Geiger counter
>> purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery
>> stores
>> for radioactive contamination.  What she discovered was absolutely
>> stunning.  *Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were
>> made in China, *
>> *tested very high for radiation. * So is this being caused by nuclear
>> radiation from Fukushima?  Is the seafood that we are eating going to give
>> us cancer
>> and other diseases?
>>
>> Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here:
>>
>>
>> http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>> ____________________________________________________________
>> *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?*
>> Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
>>  <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc>
>> FixYourBloodSugar.com<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> ...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Other related posts: