[sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
- From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 06:58:25 -0400 (EDT)
DR & Rich
I have been forwarding some of my stuff to RM as bcc and the reply comes out as
dmarc-noreplhy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
so probably that is the answer?
Comrade B
-----Original Message-----
From: D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, May 25, 2014 9:23 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
Crazy email program!
DR
On May 25, 2014 8:45 PM, "Richard Monjure" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wait a minute... what the hell is going on? I hit reply to Dave, and I get
sparkscoffee in the to box.
How in the world is this happening?????
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:44 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hey Dave, can you believe how stupid those guys are? They're having childhood
memories of the old Buck Rodgers T.V. show!
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:43 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well you know me, Dave. I am the definition of calm and rationality!
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 2:09 PM, "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Strange, the email address to Richard Monjure was rejected, how'd that happen?
Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Technical details of permanent failure:
Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for the
recipient domain freelists.org byturing.freelists.org. [206.53.239.180].
The error that the other server returned was:
550 5.1.1 <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User
unknown in local recipient table
73
DR
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
We needed a balanced reasoned voice, RM. Welcome back.
I do like the the special email address you acquired. Nice.
73
DR
On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Richard Monjure <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
What the fuck? How did I get on this fucking list again?!!
Moderator, please take me off!
Rich
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then?
As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now. The danger
is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain to do sometime
in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now. The problem, like so
many problems these days is being handled by kicking the can down the road for
the next president or the next generation to deal with.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx"
Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100
s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
Stan,
I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors the
rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to leave
earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and gravity
would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it anywhere
else, though its not rocket science.
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx"
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
JS
Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the handeling
and polluting space
plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you have a
great idea. Is
it original or you read it somewhere?
Comrade B
-----Original Message-----
From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
RR
You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be necessary.
Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending them into the
sun would solve our problem.
js
---------- Original Message ----------
From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
JS,
The contaminated water is being stored in thousands of big storage tanks which
would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not a practical
solution on multiple levels.
Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but it looks
like it will destroy the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be
the means by which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves, accidentally
through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun. Launch technology is so
good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of catastrophic
failure on launch are pretty minimal. If this policy were adopted, our nuclear
waste problem would be solved. Of course the "environmental" assholes would go
ballistic. But that's apolitical problem that any faculty lounge prognosticator
should be able to deal with.
JS
---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx"
for DMARC)
To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
Radioactive W...
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
RR
I agree with you 100% on this one.
Comrade B
In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
There's a showon HBO called "VICE" that is currently airing a report on
Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is real because
if it is then the horrors to come are beyond imagining. But then, what they
have done so far is almost beyond imagining, having built several square miles
of tank farms to hold contaminated water with no way to dispose of it and with
no end in sight. You would think that after all this time somebody would have
come up with a way to deal with radioactive waste.
-RR
-----Original Message-----
From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM
To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
Ron G,
Here's the article directly from the Japan Times. Read it carefully.
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM
Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary.
According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released was
captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it could
settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors. Letting the runoff water
reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so the idea is to
capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach the reactor
basement. It's tested before release to confirm that it's within safety levels
for radiation.
I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder is not
honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article.
Kelly A.
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700
From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx
To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive
Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From
Fukushima Into The Pacific
By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014
According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive water
into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that
for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of radioactive
water to be released into the ocean every single day…
And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has been
getting into the seafood being sold in North America.
For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being
discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to
Canada…
• 73 percent of the mackerel
• 91 percent of the halibut
• 92 percent of the sardines
• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada?
Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high school
student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores
for radioactive contamination. What she found was absolutely stunning…
A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that her
school science project would make headlines all over the world.
But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter
purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery
stores
for radioactive contamination. What she discovered was absolutely stunning.
Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made in China,
tested very high for radiation. So is this being caused by nuclear radiation
from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to give us cancer
and other diseases?
Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here:
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific
...
____________________________________________________________
The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
FixYourBloodSugar.com
...
...
Other related posts:
