[sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
- From: "Richard Monjure" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "rca6u@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
- To: "sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 19:17:26 -0700 (PDT)
Dave,
Do you know how I can stop the sparkscoffee thing from happening? I want to
reply to you, but I keep replying to this list.
I don't want to be on the list! I must have pressed the wrong button or
something.
So, help a fellow brass-pounder out if you can. How do I get off this stupid
list?
73,
Rich
On Sunday, May 25, 2014 9:23 PM, "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Crazy email program!
DR
On May 25, 2014 8:45 PM, "Richard Monjure" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wait a minute... what the hell is going on? I hit reply to Dave, and I get
sparkscoffee in the to box.
>
>
>How in the world is this happening?????
>
>
>
>On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:44 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>Hey Dave, can you believe how stupid those guys are? They're having childhood
>memories of the old Buck Rodgers T.V. show!
>
>
>
>On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:43 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>Well you know me, Dave. I am the definition of calm and rationality!
>
>
>
>On Sunday, May 25, 2014 2:09 PM, "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>Strange, the email address to Richard Monjure was rejected, how'd that happen?
>
>
>Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently:
>
> dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>Technical details of permanent failure:
>Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server for
>the recipient domain freelists.org byturing.freelists.org. [206.53.239.180].
>
>The error that the other server returned was:
>550 5.1.1 <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User
>unknown in local recipient table
>
>
>
>73
>DR
>
>
>
>On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>We needed a balanced reasoned voice, RM. Welcome back.
>>
>>
>>I do like the the special email address you acquired. Nice.
>>
>>
>>
>>73
>>
>>
>>DR
>>
>>
>>
>>On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Richard Monjure
>><dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>What the fuck? How did I get on this fucking list again?!!
>>>
>>>
>>>Moderator, please take me off!
>>>
>>>
>>>Rich
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then?
>>>
>>>As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now.The
>>>danger is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain to
>>>do sometime in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now. The
>>>problem, like so many problems these days is being handled by kicking the
>>>can down the road for the next president or the next generation to deal
>>>with.
>>>
>>>-RR
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx"
>>>>Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM
>>>>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100
>>>> s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Stan,
>>>>
>>>>I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors the
>>>>rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to
>>>>leave earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and
>>>>gravity would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it
>>>>anywhere else, though its not rocket science.
>>>>
>>>>JS
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>---------- Original Message ----------
>>>>From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender
>>>>"sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
>>>>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100
>>>>s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>JS
>>>>Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the
>>>>handeling and polluting space
>>>>plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you
>>>>have a great idea. Is
>>>>it original or you read it somewhere?
>>>>
>>>>Comrade B
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm
>>>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100
>>>>s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>RR
>>>>
>>>>You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be necessary.
>>>>Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending them into
>>>>the sun would solve our problem.
>>>>
>>>>js
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>----------
Original Message ----------
>>>>From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>>>>100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
>>>>
>>>>JS,
>>>>The contaminated water is being stored in thousandsof big storage tanks
>>>>which would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not a
>>>>practical solution on multiple levels.
>>>>
>>>>Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but itlooks
>>>>like it will destroy the human race in the long run. That is to say it will
>>>>be the means by which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves,
>>>>accidentally through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through
>>>>war.
>>>>
>>>>-RR
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
>>>>>Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM
>>>>>To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping
>>>>>100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun. Launch technology is
>>>>>so good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of
>>>>>catastrophic failure on launch are pretty minimal. If this policy were
>>>>>adopted, our nuclear waste problem would be solved. Of course the
>>>>>"environmental" assholes would go ballistic. But that's apolitical problem
>>>>>that any faculty lounge prognosticator should be able to deal with.
>>>>>
>>>>>JS
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>---------- Original Message ----------
>>>>>From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender
>>>>>"Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC)
>>>>>To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>>>>Radioactive W...
>>>>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>RR
>>>>>I agree with you 100% on this one.
>>>>>
>>>>>Comrade B
>>>>>
>>>>>In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
>>>>>ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>>>>>There's a showon HBO called "VICE" thatis currently airing a report on
>>>>>Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is
>>>>>realbecause if it is then the horrors to come are beyond imagining. But
>>>>>then, what they have done so far is almost beyond imagining, having built
>>>>>several square miles of tank farms to hold contaminated water with no way
>>>>>to dispose of it and with no end in sight. You would think that after all
>>>>>this time somebody would have come up with a way to deal with radioactive
>>>>>waste.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-RR
>>>>>>
>>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM
>>>>>>>To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>>>>>>Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Ron G,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Here's the article
directly from the Japan Times. Read it carefully.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released
>>>>>>>was captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it
>>>>>>>could settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors. Letting the
>>>>>>>runoff water reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it,
>>>>>>>so the idea is to capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to
>>>>>>>reach the reactor basement. It's tested before release to confirm that
>>>>>>>it's within safety levels for radiation.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>I'm not trusting
everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder is not honestly and
accurately citing the Japan Times article.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Kelly A.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>________________________________
>>>>>>>Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700
>>>>>>>From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx
>>>>>>>To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of
>>>>>>>Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From
>>>>>>>Fukushima Into The Pacific
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive
>>>>>>>water into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that
>>>>>>>for the foreseeable future we should expect
another 100 tons of radioactive water to be released into the ocean every
single day…
>>>>>>>And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has
>>>>>>>been getting into the seafood being sold in North America.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was
>>>>>>>being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was
>>>>>>>selling to Canada…
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 73 percent of the mackerel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 91 percent of the halibut
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 92 percent of the sardines
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 93 percent of the tuna and eel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>• 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in
>>>>>>>Canada?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high
>>>>>>>school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery
>>>>>>>stores
>>>>>>>for radioactive contamination. What she found
was absolutely stunning…
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined
>>>>>>>that her school science project would make headlines all over the world.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter
>>>>>>>purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local
>>>>>>>grocery stores
>>>>>>>for radioactive contamination. What she discovered was absolutely
>>>>>>>stunning. Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made
>>>>>>>in China,
>>>>>>>tested very high for radiation. So is this being caused by nuclear
>>>>>>>radiation from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to
>>>>>>>give us cancer
>>>>>>>and other diseases?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>...
>>>>>
>>>>>____________________________________________________________
>>>>>The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
>>>>>Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
>>>>>FixYourBloodSugar.com
>>>>...
>>>...
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts: