Crazy email program! DR On May 25, 2014 8:45 PM, "Richard Monjure" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Wait a minute... what the hell is going on? I hit reply to Dave, and I > get sparkscoffee in the to box. > > How in the world is this happening????? > > > On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:44 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Hey Dave, can you believe how stupid those guys are? They're having > childhood memories of the old Buck Rodgers T.V. show! > > > On Sunday, May 25, 2014 8:43 PM, Richard Monjure <rca6u@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Well you know me, Dave. I am the definition of calm and rationality! > > > On Sunday, May 25, 2014 2:09 PM, "D.J.J. Ring, Jr." <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > Strange, the email address to Richard Monjure was rejected, how'd that > happen? > > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your message, but it was rejected by the server > for the recipient domain freelists.org byturing.freelists.org. > [206.53.239.180]. > > The error that the other server returned was: > 550 5.1.1 <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: Recipient address rejected: User > unknown in local recipient table > > 73 > DR > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 2:04 PM, D.J.J. Ring, Jr. <n1ea@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > We needed a balanced reasoned voice, RM. Welcome back. > > I do like the the special email address you acquired. Nice. > > 73 > > DR > > > On Sun, May 25, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Richard Monjure < > dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > What the fuck? How did I get on this fucking list again?!! > > Moderator, please take me off! > > Rich > > > On Sunday, May 25, 2014 11:21 AM, Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Rockets can, and do fail to launch all the time. What then? > > As for burying it deep underground, that's what they do with it now. The > danger is that it can leak into the drinking water, which it is certain > to do sometime in the future, even if it's thousand's of years from now. > The problem, like so many problems these days is being handled by kicking > the can down the road for the next president or the next generation to deal > with. > > -RR > > -----Original Message----- > From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" > Sent: May 25, 2014 8:45 AM > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping > 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... > > Stan, > > I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors > the rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to > leave earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and > gravity would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it > anywhere else, though its not rocket science. > > JS > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender " > sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC) > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping > 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT) > > JS > Don't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the > handeling and polluting space > plus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to the sun? Otherwise you > have a great idea. Is > it original or you read it somewhere? > > Comrade B > > > -----Original Message----- > From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> > To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping > 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... > > RR > > You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be > necessary. Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending > them into the sun would solve our problem. > > js > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping > 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00) > > JS, > The contaminated water is being stored in thousands of big storage tanks > which would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not a > practical solution on multiple levels. > > Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but itlooks > like it will destroy > the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be the means by > which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves, accidentally > through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war. > > -RR > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> > Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM > To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping > 100s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... > > One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun. Launch technology is > so good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of > catastrophic failure on launch are pretty minimal. If this policy were > adopted, our nuclear waste problem would be solved. Of course the > "environmental" assholes would go ballistic. But that's apolitical problem > that any faculty lounge prognosticator should be able to deal with. > > JS > > > > > ---------- Original Message ---------- > From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender " > Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" for DMARC) > To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of > Radioactive W... > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT) > > > RR > I agree with you 100% on this one. > > Comrade B > > In a message dated 5/24/2014 2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, > ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > > There's a showon HBO called "VICE" that is currently airing a report on > Fukishima. It's difficult to believe that what they are showing is > realbecause if it is then the horrors > to come are beyond imagining. But then, what they have done so far is > almost beyond imagining, having built several square miles of tank farms > to hold contaminated water with no way to dispose of it and with no end > in sight. You would think that after all this time somebody would have > come up with a way to deal with radioactive waste. > > -RR > > -----Original Message----- > From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM > To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of > Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific > > Ron G, > > Here's the article directly from the Japan Times. Read it carefully. > > > http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM > > Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary. > > According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released > was captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it > could settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors. Letting the > runoff water reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so > the idea is to capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach > the reactor basement. It's tested before release to confirm that it's > within safety levels for radiation. > > I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder is > not honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article. > > Kelly A. > > > > ------------------------------ > Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700 > From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx > To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of > Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific > > > Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From > Fukushima Into The Pacific > > By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014 > > According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive water > into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that > for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of > radioactive water to be released into the ocean every single day… > And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has > been getting into the seafood being sold in North America. > > For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was > being discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was > selling to Canada… > > • 73 percent of the mackerel > > • 91 percent of the halibut > > • 92 percent of the sardines > > • 93 percent of the tuna and eel > > • 94 percent of the cod and anchovies > > • 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish > > So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada? > > Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high > school student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores > for radioactive contamination. What she found was absolutely stunning… > > A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that > her school science project would make headlines all over the world. > But that is precisely what has happened. Using a $600 Geiger counter > purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery > stores > for radioactive contamination. What she discovered was absolutely > stunning. *Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made > in China, * > *tested very high for radiation. * So is this being caused by nuclear > radiation from Fukushima? Is the seafood that we are eating going to give > us cancer > and other diseases? > > Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here: > > > http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific > > ... > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > *The #1 Worst Carb Ever?* > Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!) > <http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc> > FixYourBloodSugar.com<http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3132/5380ec712a8136c705322st03vuc> > > ... > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > >