[sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...

  • From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 25 May 2014 14:45:01 GMT

Stan, I think the cost of the rockets vs storage (and potential leaks) favors 
the rocket idea. From what I can see, it would only require enough power to 
leave earth orbit on a sun bound trajectory. Speed wouldn t be a factor and 
gravity would do most of the work. Anyway, that's my idea. Haven't read it 
anywhere else, though its not rocket science. JS

---------- Original Message ----------
From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s 
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 20:53:36 -0400 (EDT)


JSDon't forget the cost, it is not cheap to fuel those rockets plus the 
handeling and polluting spaceplus I never heard of anyone sending a rocket to 
the sun? Otherwise you have a great idea. Isit original or you read it 
somewhere? Comrade B  -----Original Message-----
 From: schalestock <schalestock@xxxxxxxx>
 To: sparkscoffee <sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Sent: Sat, May 24, 2014 5:46 pm
 Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100 s 
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
 
RR You are probably right about the number of rockets that would be necessary. 
Though, you must admit, if rocket supply was no problem, sending them into the 
sun would solve our problem. js
 
 ---------- Original Message ----------
 From: Ron Ristad <ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s 
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W...
 Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:29:40 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
 
 JS,
 The contaminated water is being stored in thousands of big storage tanks which 
would require tens of thousands rockets to launch into space. Not a practical 
solution on multiple levels.
 
 Technology might create a better life for many in the short run but it looks 
like it will destroy the human race in the long run. That is to say it will be 
the means by which humans finally manage to annihilate themselves, accidentally 
through negligence and stupidity if not intentionally through war.
 
 -RR
  -----Original Message----- 
 From: "schalestock@xxxxxxxx" <schalestock@xxxxxxxx> 
 Sent: May 24, 2014 1:00 PM 
 To: sparkscoffee@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
 Subject: [sparkscoffee] Re: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s 
Of Tons Of Radioa ctive W... 
 
One answer would be to shoot the waste into the sun.  Launch technology is so 
good now that with the emergency jettison system, the odds of catastrophic 
failure on launch are pretty  minimal. If this policy were adopted, our nuclear 
waste problem would be solved. Of course the "environmental" assholes would go 
ballistic. But that's apolitical problem that any faculty lounge prognosticator 
should be able to deal with. JS  
 
 ---------- Original Message ----------
 From: "" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "Sblumen123@xxxxxxx" 
for DMARC)
 To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of 
Radioactive W...
 Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 14:25:09 -0400 (EDT)
 
 RRI agree with you 100% on this one. Comrade B In a message dated 5/24/2014 
2:19:29 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, ristad@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:There's a showon 
HBO called "VICE" that is currently airing a report on Fukishima. It's 
difficult to believe that what they are showing is real because if it is then 
the horrors to come are beyond imagining. But then, what they have done so far 
is almost beyond imagining, having built several square miles of tank farms to 
hold contaminated water with no way to dispose of it and with no end in sight. 
You would think that after all this time somebody would have come up with a way 
to deal with radioactive waste.
 
 -RR
 -----Original Message----- 
 From: Kelly <KELLYUTAH@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Sent: May 24, 2014 11:58 AM 
 To: "aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <ARANET@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: [aranet] Re: Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of 
Radioactive Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific 
 
Ron G, 
 
 Here's the article directly from the Japan Times.  Read it carefully.
 
 
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2014/05/21/national/in-new-phase-fukushima-workers-begin-releasing-groundwater/#.U4DbACgZuuM
 
 Not quite as alarming as Michael Snyder was aiming for in his commentary.
 
 According to the original Japan Times article, the water being released was 
captured from runoff from the hills surrounding the plant, before it could 
settle in the basements of the corrupted reactors.  Letting the runoff water 
reach the reactors would of course highly contaminate it, so the idea is to 
capture it and pump it out before it has a chance to reach the reactor 
basement.  It's tested before release to confirm that it's within safety levels 
for radiation.
 
 I'm not trusting everything I read, I'm just saying that Michael Snyder is not 
honestly and accurately citing the Japan Times article.
 
 Kelly A.
 
 
 
Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 09:07:24 -0700
 From: xgeorge@xxxxxxx
 To: aranet@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Subject: [aranet] Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive 
Water From Fukushima Into The Pacific
 
 
 Japan Begins Purposely Dumping 100s Of Tons Of Radioactive Water From 
Fukushima Into The Pacific
 
  By Michael Snyder, on May 22nd, 2014 
 
 According to the Japan Times, Tepco released 560 tons of radioactive water 
into the Pacific on Wednesday, and Tepco says that 
 for the foreseeable future we should expect another 100 tons of radioactive 
water to be released into the ocean every single day&hellip;
 And it has been documented that radioactive material from Fukushima has been 
getting into the seafood being sold in North America.
 
 For example, back in 2012 the Vancouver Sun reported that cesium-137 was being 
discovered in a very high percentage of the fish that Japan was selling to 
Canada&hellip;
 
 &bull; 73 percent of the mackerel
 
 &bull; 91 percent of the halibut
 
 &bull; 92 percent of the sardines
 
 &bull; 93 percent of the tuna and eel
 
 &bull; 94 percent of the cod and anchovies
 
 &bull; 100 percent of the carp, seaweed, shark and monkfish
 
 So why was radiation testing for seafood subsequently shut down in Canada?
 
 Since that time, as I detailed in one of my previous articles, a high school 
student up in Canada tested seafood bought at local grocery stores 
 for radioactive contamination.  What she found was absolutely stunning&hellip;
 
 A Canadian high school student named Bronwyn Delacruz never imagined that her 
school science project would make headlines all over the world.  
 But that is precisely what has happened.  Using a $600 Geiger counter 
purchased by her father, Delacruz measured seafood bought at local grocery 
stores 
 for radioactive contamination.  What she discovered was absolutely stunning.  
Much of the seafood, particularly the products that were made in China, 
 tested very high for radiation.  So is this being caused by nuclear radiation 
from Fukushima?  Is the seafood that we are eating going to give us cancer 
 and other diseases?
 
 Above are brief excerpts, for complete article go here:
 
 
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific?utm_source=feedly&utm_reader=feedly&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=japan-begins-purposely-dumping-100s-of-tons-of-radioactive-water-from-fukushima-into-the-pacific
 ...
 
 ____________________________________________________________
 The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
 Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar (Don't Eat This!)
 FixYourBloodSugar.com...
____________________________________________________________
The #1 Worst Carb Ever?
Click to Learn #1 Carb that Kills Your Blood Sugar &#40;Don&#39;t Eat This!&#41;
http://thirdpartyoffers.juno.com/TGL3131/53820262279c12610bcfst02vuc

Other related posts: