I don't think that Ed's giving Jimmy a Select with Dallas has anything to do with legislating the number of selects..unless there is something going on behind the scenes I am not privy to. If I remember correctly Dallas was either Sel 5 or 6.not sel. 18.So..if the cut off is 10..he would have been select anyhow. To my knowledge rule came about because of Ed's number of Selects..not who got the selects..". this whole situation could have been handled with common sense..ask the judge his reasoning for the number of placements awarded..suggest to the judge that if he is to judge future nationals that perhaps he could be a bit more judicious with his awards..and give the same advisement to other future national judges. this way..the judge gets the respect he is owed for being elected to judge the National by the fancy and..it allows him to use his own discretion..but with some guidelines. to me..this would have been the logical approach. Now that the dust has settled we can see that the 10 select rule was an over correction to an incident that had never happened before..and probably would never happen again. Rules made in anger, .or in the heat of the moment are usually retaliatory and are made to punish those involved...not for the 'betterment of the breed." C.Grainger > [Original Message] > From: <ELG440@xxxxxxx> > To: <showgsd-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: 5/20/2005 12:00:59 PM > Subject: [ SHOWGSD-L ] A compromise on selects > > > > In a message dated 5/20/05 8:24:58 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > EKOLAN1@xxxxxxx writes: > Now the compromise We have a breeders code that > > we sign voluntarily We propose that we have a judges code for those > judging > > the National witch will also be VOLUNTARY that states the judge agrees to > > award selects using the PC s definition of the term. If a judge thinks > that 25 > > of 50 entry is select by that definition SO BE IT. > > > > > I have no problem with this, and I have no problem with whatever the board > decides. I work with the law, and the law changes every day. I learn to adjust > to the new rules as they are made, and when reversed, change to adjust to > those changes. > > Am I the only one, however, who is worried that we now require the judge to > sign an agreement about how many shows they will judge the year before the > national; how they will conduct the temperament test; the breeder's code; and > now we want then to sign another agreement that says they will follow the > PC's definition of the term Select? > > If we so distrust the membership who votes for these people to judge the > national, ( and, that is what we are saying), maybe we should just appoint > someone from the board to judge the national, and then the board can be blamed for > being so stupid as to appoint a judge who doesn't know what to do. > > Let's stop implying things, and admit what is going on. I can't believe > that because Ed Barritt gave Jimmy Select with Sight For Sore Eyes, we are now > going to dictate to our elected judge what we want him/her to do. Because of > that one situation, we are now claiming our judges we elect in the future are > too stupid or dishonest to follow the Standard and the rules as already > established. > > Let's be honest here. This has gotten way out of control. It is time to take > a deep breath, let it out slowly, blink, think, grin and elect the best > person we can to judge our dogs, and leave them alone. > > Evan > > _Asgard German Shepherds_ (http://www.asgardgsd.com/) > http://www.asgardgsd.com/ > Where Type Movement and Temperament come together > > > ============================================================================ > POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. > > ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. > > For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org > ============================================================================ ============================================================================ POST is Copyrighted 2005. All material remains the property of the original author and of GSD Communication, Inc. NO REPRODUCTIONS or FORWARDS of any kind are permitted without prior permission of the original author AND of the Showgsd-l Management. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. ALL PERSONS ARE ON NOTICE THAT THE FORWARDING, REPRODUCTION OR USE IN ANY MANNER OF ANY MATERIAL WHICH APPEARS ON SHOWGSD-L WITHOUT THE EXPRESS PERMISSION OF ALL PARTIES TO THE POST AND THE LIST MANAGEMENT IS EXPRESSLY FORBIDDEN, AND IS A VIOLATION OF LAW. VIOLATORS OF THIS PROHIBITION WILL BE PROSECUTED. For assistance, please contact the List Management at admin@xxxxxxxxxxxx VISIT OUR WEBSITE - http://www.showgsd.org ============================================================================