[rollei_list] Re: Planar vs. Xenotar test
- From: "michael Sta. Maria" <littlwing5@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 12:10:26 -0800 (PST)
So Peter,
Just wanted to know your opinion on the
Planar because I too have recently purchased a 2.8F
Planar off of ebay. It is actually being serviced
right now by Ross Yerkes in CA, but on all of the
research I've done (which was about 2 months worth), I
thought that the Planar was the most highly sought
after of all and was the "Crown Jewel". Now I am
questioning whether I should've just settled on a "T"
and saved the extra dollars would I have been better
off?
Thanks in advance,
MIKE in NJ...
--- vzeo4njv@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In <f4387a2e050108210945b5cb9c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on
> 01/08/05
> at 09:09 PM, Peter Kotsinadelis
> <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>
> >Absolutely wrong on both. Its the Tessar that
> produces the best
> >resolution and bokeh.
>
> Attaboy!
>
> -
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Other related posts:
