[rollei_list] Re: Planar vs. Xenotar test
- From: Peter Kotsinadelis <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2005 21:09:36 -0800
Mark,
Absolutely wrong on both. Its the Tessar that produces the best
resolution and bokeh.
Peter K
On Sat, 08 Jan 2005 20:12:04 -0800, Mark Rabiner <mark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wr=
ote:
> I've been up all night for several nights wondering about if I should tra=
de
> in my Rolleiflex with 2.8 Carl Zeiss Planar.
> The guy sitting next to me on the bus says the Schneider-Kreuznach* Xenot=
ar
> has better resolving power in the corners stopped down in lower light lev=
els
> close in with an orange filter.
>=20
> Or as found in the FAQ says
> The CZ or JSK? Say what!?!
>=20
> CZ is Carl Zeiss of course.
>=20
> *And JSK is Jos. Schneider, Bad-Kreuznach.
> What happened to "JSB-K"!?!?
>=20
> Apparently these do not come out of the "Bad" School of Lens design so I'=
m
> not worrying about that.)
>=20
> Also while we're at it for backup which is better:
>=20
> The CA Tessar or the JSK Xenar?
>=20
> I'm interested in results from shots taken at infinity with a dark green
> filter at high light levels in the Adirondacks.
>=20
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
> http://rabinergroup.com/
>=20
>=20
--=20
Peter K
=D3=BF=D5=AC
Other related posts:
