[rollei_list] Re: Planar vs. Xenotar test
- From: "Fox, Robert" <RFox@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2005 15:12:57 -0500
I regret selling my T and I have the tranny's to prove that any shot 5.6 =
above, the Tessar is really impressive.
I will get another.
R.J. via Blackberry
direct office =3D (202) 434-3429
direct cell =3D (202) 549-9137
-----Original Message-----
From: rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =
<rollei_list-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun Jan 09 15:10:26 2005
Subject: [rollei_list] Re: Planar vs. Xenotar test
So Peter,
Just wanted to know your opinion on the
Planar because I too have recently purchased a 2.8F
Planar off of ebay. It is actually being serviced
right now by Ross Yerkes in CA, but on all of the
research I've done (which was about 2 months worth), I
thought that the Planar was the most highly sought
after of all and was the "Crown Jewel". Now I am
questioning whether I should've just settled on a "T"
and saved the extra dollars would I have been better
off?
Thanks in advance,
MIKE in NJ...=20
--- vzeo4njv@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In <f4387a2e050108210945b5cb9c@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on
> 01/08/05=20
> at 09:09 PM, Peter Kotsinadelis
> <peterk727@xxxxxxxxx> said:
>=20
> >Absolutely wrong on both. Its the Tessar that
> produces the best
> >resolution and bokeh.
>=20
> Attaboy!
>=20
> -=20
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
> les clark / edgewater, nj / usa
>
-----------------------------------------------------------
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
=09
__________________________________=20
Do you Yahoo!?=20
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.=20
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
Other related posts:
